CAJ | 학술논문

采用实验和回顾访谈的方法，对60位英语专业学习者英语口语产出中的认知差异进行分析。研究发现：三组被试在答题过程中的认知差异体现在：高水平组主要是编码、比较和目标定向；中水平组主要是比较、编码和目标定向；低水平组主要是联结和比较；三组被试在口语产出过程中关注重点不同：高水平组关注得体表达和交流环境；中水平组关注语法和练习；低水平组侧重词汇和语音；高水平组能较好进行自我监控和目标定向；中低水平组则均不能较好地监控产出结果，侧重于通过母语思维、英语翻译的表达方式。
채용실험화회고방담적방법，대60위영어전업학습자영어구어산출중적인지차이진행분석。연구발현：삼조피시재답제과정중적인지차이체현재：고수평조주요시편마、비교화목표정향；중수평조주요시비교、편마화목표정향；저수평조주요시련결화비교；삼조피시재구어산출과정중관주중점불동：고수평조관주득체표체화교류배경；중수평조관주어법화연습；저수평조측중사회화어음；고수평조능교호진행자아감공화목표정향；중저수평조칙균불능교호지감공산출결과，측중우통과모어사유、영어번역적표체방식。
By collecting empirical corpus and results of individual interviews,this study aims at examining 60 English majors′cognitive differences in oral English output.The findings are as follows:The cognitive process of high-level group is mainly encoding, comparison and goal orientation;medium-level group is mainly comparison,encoding and goal orientation;and low-level group is mainly connection and compari-son.High-level group pay more attention to authentic expression and communication environment;medi-um-level group focus on grammar and practice;low-level students focus on vocabulary and pronunciation. High-level group have a better use of self-monitoring and goal orientation.Neither medium-level group nor low-level group can monitor output results properly,mainly relying on thinking in Chinese and translating in English.