粮油食品科技
糧油食品科技
량유식품과기
Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods
2015年
5期
32-36
,共5页
张明明%刘玉兰%杨金强%刘必衍
張明明%劉玉蘭%楊金彊%劉必衍
장명명%류옥란%양금강%류필연
邻苯二甲酸酯%吸附脱除%活性炭%茶籽油
鄰苯二甲痠酯%吸附脫除%活性炭%茶籽油
린분이갑산지%흡부탈제%활성탄%다자유
phthalic acid ester%adsorption removal%activated carbon%camellia oil
采用10种不同的吸附剂对冷榨茶籽油中邻苯二甲酸酯类塑化剂进行吸附脱除,考察了吸附剂种类、吸附剂用量、吸附温度及吸附时间对受试油样中5种塑化剂组分脱除效果的影响。结果表明:在吸附温度110℃、吸附时间30 min、吸附剂用量为油重的2%时,H -2型活性炭的脱除效果较好,其次为55F -A 型活性炭、55JN -C 型活性炭、凹凸棒土和活性白土。采用 H -2型活性炭用量为2.0%、吸附温度130℃、吸附时间50 min 的优化条件,DMP、DEP、DIBP、DBP 及 DEHP 的脱除率分别为76.7%、50.7%、52.4%、22.2%、6.1%。吸附法对茶籽油中 DMP、DEP、DIBP 的脱除效果较好,但对较大分子量塑化剂组分 DBP 和 DEHP 的脱除效果较差。
採用10種不同的吸附劑對冷榨茶籽油中鄰苯二甲痠酯類塑化劑進行吸附脫除,攷察瞭吸附劑種類、吸附劑用量、吸附溫度及吸附時間對受試油樣中5種塑化劑組分脫除效果的影響。結果錶明:在吸附溫度110℃、吸附時間30 min、吸附劑用量為油重的2%時,H -2型活性炭的脫除效果較好,其次為55F -A 型活性炭、55JN -C 型活性炭、凹凸棒土和活性白土。採用 H -2型活性炭用量為2.0%、吸附溫度130℃、吸附時間50 min 的優化條件,DMP、DEP、DIBP、DBP 及 DEHP 的脫除率分彆為76.7%、50.7%、52.4%、22.2%、6.1%。吸附法對茶籽油中 DMP、DEP、DIBP 的脫除效果較好,但對較大分子量塑化劑組分 DBP 和 DEHP 的脫除效果較差。
채용10충불동적흡부제대랭자다자유중린분이갑산지류소화제진행흡부탈제,고찰료흡부제충류、흡부제용량、흡부온도급흡부시간대수시유양중5충소화제조분탈제효과적영향。결과표명:재흡부온도110℃、흡부시간30 min、흡부제용량위유중적2%시,H -2형활성탄적탈제효과교호,기차위55F -A 형활성탄、55JN -C 형활성탄、요철봉토화활성백토。채용 H -2형활성탄용량위2.0%、흡부온도130℃、흡부시간50 min 적우화조건,DMP、DEP、DIBP、DBP 급 DEHP 적탈제솔분별위76.7%、50.7%、52.4%、22.2%、6.1%。흡부법대다자유중 DMP、DEP、DIBP 적탈제효과교호,단대교대분자량소화제조분 DBP 화 DEHP 적탈제효과교차。
The effects of adsorbent type (10 types of adsorbents),adsorbent dosage,adsorption tempera-ture and adsorption time on the removal of 5 plasticizers in camellia oil were investigated.The results showed that the optimal adsorbent was H -2 activated carbon,followed by 55F -A activated carbon, 55JN -C activated carbon,attapulgite and activated clay,when the adsorption temperature was 110 ℃, the adsorption time was 30 min and the dosage of adsorbent was 2.0%.Under the optimal condition (the adsorption temperature was 130 ℃,the adsorption time was 50 min and the dosage of the H -2 activated carbon was 2.0%),the removal rates of DMP,DEP,DIBP,DBP and DEHP were 76.7%,50.7%, 52.4%,22.2% and 6.1%,respectively.Removing DMP,DEP and DIBP from camellia oil by adsorp-tion was efficient,while inefficient for high molecular weight DBP and DEHP.