大家健康（中旬版）
大傢健康（中旬版）
대가건강（중순판）
For All Health
2015年
10期
16-17
,共2页
不安全因素%防范对策%血液透析%临床护理%应用价值
不安全因素%防範對策%血液透析%臨床護理%應用價值
불안전인소%방범대책%혈액투석%림상호리%응용개치
Unsafe factors%Preventive measures%Hemodialysis%Clinical nursing%Application value
目的:探讨不安全因素和防范对策在血液透析护理中的应用价值. 方法:选取我院于2014 年5月~2014年5 月期间收治的106例血液透析患者作为研究对象,将其随机进行分组,对照组与观察组各53例,对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用风险管理护理,对比两组患者护理干预后的治疗效果,进而分析血液透析护理中不安全因素,并总结出相应的防范对策. 结果:对照组的护理满意度为83.0%,观察组为96.2%,对比差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05). 对照组的风险事件发生率为15.1%,观察组为5.7%,对比差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论:不安全因素和防范对策在血液透析护理中的应用价值较高,可降低风险事件发生率,具有临床可行性.
目的:探討不安全因素和防範對策在血液透析護理中的應用價值. 方法:選取我院于2014 年5月~2014年5 月期間收治的106例血液透析患者作為研究對象,將其隨機進行分組,對照組與觀察組各53例,對照組採用常規護理,觀察組採用風險管理護理,對比兩組患者護理榦預後的治療效果,進而分析血液透析護理中不安全因素,併總結齣相應的防範對策. 結果:對照組的護理滿意度為83.0%,觀察組為96.2%,對比差異顯著,有統計學意義(P<0.05). 對照組的風險事件髮生率為15.1%,觀察組為5.7%,對比差異顯著,有統計學意義(P<0.05). 結論:不安全因素和防範對策在血液透析護理中的應用價值較高,可降低風險事件髮生率,具有臨床可行性.
목적:탐토불안전인소화방범대책재혈액투석호리중적응용개치. 방법:선취아원우2014 년5월~2014년5 월기간수치적106례혈액투석환자작위연구대상,장기수궤진행분조,대조조여관찰조각53례,대조조채용상규호리,관찰조채용풍험관리호리,대비량조환자호리간예후적치료효과,진이분석혈액투석호리중불안전인소,병총결출상응적방범대책. 결과:대조조적호리만의도위83.0%,관찰조위96.2%,대비차이현저,유통계학의의(P<0.05). 대조조적풍험사건발생솔위15.1%,관찰조위5.7%,대비차이현저,유통계학의의(P<0.05). 결론:불안전인소화방범대책재혈액투석호리중적응용개치교고,가강저풍험사건발생솔,구유림상가행성.
Objective: To explore the application value of unsafe factors and preventive measures in hemodialysis nursing.Methods:106 hemodialysis pa-tients treated in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2014 were randomly divided into control group and observation group.53 cases in control group were treated with routine nursing.The treatment effect was compared between the two groups.Results:the nursing satisfaction of the control group was 83%, the observation group was 96.2%, the difference was statistically significant ( P <0.05 ) .The risk event rate in the control group was 15.1%, the observation group was 5.7%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:unsafe factors and preventive measures in the hemodialysis nursing in the application of higher value, can reduce the risk of incident rate, has clinical feasibility.
