非常规油气
非常規油氣
비상규유기
Unconventional Oil & Gas
2015年
4期
40-44
,共5页
清蜡剂%水包油型%溶蜡速率%采油率
清蠟劑%水包油型%溶蠟速率%採油率
청사제%수포유형%용사속솔%채유솔
wax remover%oil-in-water type%wax dissolution rate%oil recovery rate
清蜡剂的效果对油井清蜡作业至关重要, 针对现阶段常用清蜡剂毒性大、 易燃、 溶蜡效率低等缺点, 通过室内实验研制了一种新型水包油型清蜡剂, 并在油田进行了试验. 制订了水包油型清蜡剂中不同添加剂及其含量对清蜡效率影响的实验方案, 分析确定最佳配方为55%混合有机溶剂、 17%混合型表面活性剂、 10%正己醇、 2%氯化钠、 3. 5%甲酸盐加重剂及水. 多项性能参数表明, 该清蜡剂性能明显优于常规油基清蜡剂. 两组矿场对比试验井的试验结果表明, 加入水包油型清蜡剂的单井抽油机载荷量分别降低25. 07%和48. 01%, 较加入常规清蜡剂的邻井分别高出20个百分点和33个百分点, 载荷量降低明显,应用效果良好. 该新型清蜡剂溶蜡效率高、 成本低、 环保性好, 推广应用前景广阔.
清蠟劑的效果對油井清蠟作業至關重要, 針對現階段常用清蠟劑毒性大、 易燃、 溶蠟效率低等缺點, 通過室內實驗研製瞭一種新型水包油型清蠟劑, 併在油田進行瞭試驗. 製訂瞭水包油型清蠟劑中不同添加劑及其含量對清蠟效率影響的實驗方案, 分析確定最佳配方為55%混閤有機溶劑、 17%混閤型錶麵活性劑、 10%正己醇、 2%氯化鈉、 3. 5%甲痠鹽加重劑及水. 多項性能參數錶明, 該清蠟劑性能明顯優于常規油基清蠟劑. 兩組礦場對比試驗井的試驗結果錶明, 加入水包油型清蠟劑的單井抽油機載荷量分彆降低25. 07%和48. 01%, 較加入常規清蠟劑的鄰井分彆高齣20箇百分點和33箇百分點, 載荷量降低明顯,應用效果良好. 該新型清蠟劑溶蠟效率高、 成本低、 環保性好, 推廣應用前景廣闊.
청사제적효과대유정청사작업지관중요, 침대현계단상용청사제독성대、 역연、 용사효솔저등결점, 통과실내실험연제료일충신형수포유형청사제, 병재유전진행료시험. 제정료수포유형청사제중불동첨가제급기함량대청사효솔영향적실험방안, 분석학정최가배방위55%혼합유궤용제、 17%혼합형표면활성제、 10%정기순、 2%록화납、 3. 5%갑산염가중제급수. 다항성능삼수표명, 해청사제성능명현우우상규유기청사제. 량조광장대비시험정적시험결과표명, 가입수포유형청사제적단정추유궤재하량분별강저25. 07%화48. 01%, 교가입상규청사제적린정분별고출20개백분점화33개백분점, 재하량강저명현,응용효과량호. 해신형청사제용사효솔고、 성본저、 배보성호, 추엄응용전경엄활.
The effect of wax remover is critical for wax removing of oil wells. For the high toxicity, flammability, low wax dissolution rate and other shortcomings of commonly used wax removers, we developed a new type of oil-in-water wax re-mover in lab and tested in oilfields. We made experiment plans about the influence of different additives and their content on wax removing efficiency in oil-in-water wax removers, and determined the best formula consisting of 55% mixed organic solvent, 17% compound surfactant, 10% hexanol, 2% sodium chloride, 3. 5% sodium formate and water. Performance pa-rameters showed that the new wax remover was superior to conventional oil-based one. Test results of two groups of wells in-dicated that the load of a single well pumping unit could be reduced by 25. 07% and 48. 01% respectively after being added into oil-in-water wax remover, 20% and 33% higher than that of adjacent wells with conventional wax remover. The load was reduced remarkably and the application results were good. The new wax remover featured in high wax dissolution effi-ciency, low cost, good environmental protection, and broad prospect for application.