CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨颈臂丛神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折手术中的麻醉方法及效果。方法：收治锁骨骨折患者90例，随机分为颈臂丛联合阻滞麻醉组、颈丛阻滞麻醉组、臂丛阻滞麻醉组各30例，比较3种麻醉方法的麻醉效果和不良反应。结果：颈臂丛联合组麻醉效果最为满意，而不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义。结论：颈臂丛联合神经阻滞用于锁骨骨折手术麻醉效果满意，阻滞效果明显优于颈丛、臂丛神经阻滞，不良反应小。
목적：탐토경비총신경조체마취재쇄골골절수술중적마취방법급효과。방법：수치쇄골골절환자90례，수궤분위경비총연합조체마취조、경총조체마취조、비총조체마취조각30례，비교3충마취방법적마취효과화불량반응。결과：경비총연합조마취효과최위만의，이불량반응발생솔적차이무통계학의의。결론：경비총연합신경조체용우쇄골골절수술마취효과만의，조체효과명현우우경총、비총신경조체，불량반응소。
Objective:To explore the anesthetic method and effect of cervical brachial plexus block in the operation of clavicle fracture.Methods:90 patients with clavicle fractures were selected,they were randomly divided into the cervical brachial plexus block anesthesia group,cervical plexus block anesthesia group and brachial plexus block anesthesia group with 30 cases in each, we compared the anesthesia effect and adverse reactions of the three methods.Methods:Anesthetic effect of cervical brachial plexus block was most satisfactory,and the difference of the incidence of adverse reactions was not statistically significant. Conclusion:The anesthetic effect of cervical brachial plexus block in the operation of clavicle fracture was satisfactory,the blocking effect was significantly better than that of cervical plexus block and brachial plexus block,and the side effects were small.