解放军医学院学报
解放軍醫學院學報
해방군의학원학보
Academic Journal of Chinese Pla Medical School
2015年
10期
1000-1002,1055
,共4页
肠易激综合征%护理%焦虑%抑郁
腸易激綜閤徵%護理%焦慮%抑鬱
장역격종합정%호리%초필%억욱
irritable bowel syndrome%nursing care%anxiety%depression
目的：分析综合护理干预在治疗肠易激综合征中的临床效果。方法选择2012年4月-2014年12月在我院住院的120例肠易激综合征患者作为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组各60例，在给予药物治疗同时，分别实施综合护理干预和常规护理。治疗前及治疗8周后所有患者分别完善肠易激综合征知识问卷、焦虑、抑郁自评量表，并分别采集患者临床症状资料，观察疗效。结果观察组治疗效果明显优于对照组(86.67% vs 61.67%，P ＜0.05)，治疗后观察组焦虑、抑郁评分较对照组显著降低(42.54±6.04 vs 52.92±6.09，45.42±5.84 vs 54.88±5.91，P ＜0.05)，肠易激综合征知识问卷得分较对照组显著升高(23.15±3.82 vs 16.76±4.73，P ＜0.05)。结论综合护理干预较常规护理干预可提高肠易激综合征患者的治疗效果。
目的：分析綜閤護理榦預在治療腸易激綜閤徵中的臨床效果。方法選擇2012年4月-2014年12月在我院住院的120例腸易激綜閤徵患者作為研究對象，隨機分為觀察組和對照組各60例，在給予藥物治療同時，分彆實施綜閤護理榦預和常規護理。治療前及治療8週後所有患者分彆完善腸易激綜閤徵知識問捲、焦慮、抑鬱自評量錶，併分彆採集患者臨床癥狀資料，觀察療效。結果觀察組治療效果明顯優于對照組(86.67% vs 61.67%，P ＜0.05)，治療後觀察組焦慮、抑鬱評分較對照組顯著降低(42.54±6.04 vs 52.92±6.09，45.42±5.84 vs 54.88±5.91，P ＜0.05)，腸易激綜閤徵知識問捲得分較對照組顯著升高(23.15±3.82 vs 16.76±4.73，P ＜0.05)。結論綜閤護理榦預較常規護理榦預可提高腸易激綜閤徵患者的治療效果。
목적：분석종합호리간예재치료장역격종합정중적림상효과。방법선택2012년4월-2014년12월재아원주원적120례장역격종합정환자작위연구대상，수궤분위관찰조화대조조각60례，재급여약물치료동시，분별실시종합호리간예화상규호리。치료전급치료8주후소유환자분별완선장역격종합정지식문권、초필、억욱자평량표，병분별채집환자림상증상자료，관찰료효。결과관찰조치료효과명현우우대조조(86.67% vs 61.67%，P ＜0.05)，치료후관찰조초필、억욱평분교대조조현저강저(42.54±6.04 vs 52.92±6.09，45.42±5.84 vs 54.88±5.91，P ＜0.05)，장역격종합정지식문권득분교대조조현저승고(23.15±3.82 vs 16.76±4.73，P ＜0.05)。결론종합호리간예교상규호리간예가제고장역격종합정환자적치료효과。
Objective To analyze curative effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Methods From April 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients with irritable bowel syndrome in our hospital were chosen as research objects and they were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (n=60) and control group (n=60). Patients in two groups underwent medication combined with comprehensive nursing intervention and routine nursing, respectively. And they were asked to complete self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale, knowledge questionnaire of irritable bowel syndrome before and 8 weeks after treatment, and their clinical symptoms were collected to observe the curative effect. Results After treatment, the curative effect of observation group was much better than control group (86.67% vs 61.67%, P < 0.05), the anxiety and depression scale score of observation group was significantly lower than control group [(42.54±6.04) vs (52.92±6.09), (45.42±5.84) vs (54.88±5.91), P < 0.05]. The knowledge questionnaire score of observation group was significantly higher than control group [(23.15±3.82) vs (16.76±4.73), P < 0.05]. Conclusion Compared with conventional care, comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the curative effect of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.
