CAJ | 학술논문

分析折中主义“纳众家之长”，摆脱了范式和理论抽象的束缚。它将现有研究成果运用于问题驱动式研究，以此为研究起点；将来源于各个独立范式中的原理进行“中层理论”式的因果分析，以此为研究方法；通过务实的态度试图对真实世界有更加“真实”的理解，以此为研究目的，从而实现国际问题研究的两大转向：即从范式研究走向多样化范式整合的研究，从抽象的“理论导向”研究走向实用主义的“问题导向”研究，创造了范式解释和跨范式解释共存的局面。在此基础上，本文试图通过南海问题这一具体案例展现分析折中主义的特点和优势。
분석절중주의“납음가지장”，파탈료범식화이론추상적속박。타장현유연구성과운용우문제구동식연구，이차위연구기점；장래원우각개독립범식중적원리진행“중층이론”식적인과분석，이차위연구방법；통과무실적태도시도대진실세계유경가“진실”적리해，이차위연구목적，종이실현국제문제연구적량대전향：즉종범식연구주향다양화범식정합적연구，종추상적“이론도향”연구주향실용주의적“문제도향”연구，창조료범식해석화과범식해석공존적국면。재차기출상，본문시도통과남해문제저일구체안례전현분석절중주의적특점화우세。
This article introduces analytic eclecticism which is a complement to paradigm-bound scholar-ship. Its starting point of research is applying the existing research results to the problem-driven research;its research method is analyzing principles which come from separate paradigms in a “mid-range theory”type of causal analysis and its purpose of study is a better understanding of real-world phenomena in a prag-matic way. Thus, analytic eclecticism achieves two shifts in the field of international studies: one is from the single paradigm research to the integrated research of multiple paradigms;the other is from the abstract theory-driven to the pragmatic problem-driven research, and there appears a coexistence of a paradigm ex-planation and cross-paradigm explanation. On the basis, this article illustrates the characteristics and ad-vantages of analytic eclecticism through analyzing the issue of the South China Sea.