CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨焦虑情绪个体和正常对照个体在不同反馈类型风险决策(正性反馈、负性反馈)时的行为学差异.方法以北京某大学400名在校大学生作为研究对象,运用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和状态焦虑量表(SAI)进行双重筛选,将其分为焦虑组和对照组,采用仿真气球冒险任务(balloon analogue risktask,BART)进行行为学实验.结果焦虑组[(23.33±5.30)分]与对照组[(27.75±7.23)分]未吹爆气球次数比较中差异无统计学意义(t=-1.90,P＞0.05);焦虑组(24.28±6.12)与对照组(29.80±7.26)吹爆气球次数比较中差异具有统计学意义(t=-2.25,P＜0.05),且对照组吹爆气球次数大于焦虑组;但在面对正负反馈情况下,两组吹爆气球次数均差异无统计学意义(t=-1.82,P＞0.05;t=-1.78,P＞0.05).结论焦虑情绪对决策影响多表现为风险回避.
목적 탐토초필정서개체화정상대조개체재불동반궤류형풍험결책(정성반궤、부성반궤)시적행위학차이.방법 이북경모대학400명재교대학생작위연구대상,운용초필자평량표(SAS)화상태초필량표(SAI)진행쌍중사선,장기분위초필조화대조조,채용방진기구모험임무(balloon analogue risktask,BART)진행행위학실험.결과 초필조[(23.33±5.30)분]여대조조[(27.75±7.23)분]미취폭기구차수비교중차이무통계학의의(t=-1.90,P＞0.05);초필조(24.28±6.12)여대조조(29.80±7.26)취폭기구차수비교중차이구유통계학의의(t=-2.25,P＜0.05),차대조조취폭기구차수대우초필조;단재면대정부반궤정황하,량조취폭기구차수균차이무통계학의의(t=-1.82,P＞0.05;t=-1.78,P＞0.05).결론 초필정서대결책영향다표현위풍험회피.
Objective To explore the differences in behavior of anxiety individuals and the normal control under different feedback (positive feedback,negative feedback).Methods 400 university students were investigated using self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and state anxiety inventory (SAI) and the data were analyzed with balloon analogue risk task.Results The score of anxiety group(24.28±6.12) was significantly lower (t=-2.25,P＜0.05) than that of control group(29.80±7.26) in the number of busting balloons.But in the number of busting balloons of positive and negative feedback condition,scores of anxiety group and control group were not significantly different(t=-1.82,P＞0.05;t=-1.78,P＞0.05).Conclusions Influence of anxiety on decision-making often manifests as risk aversion.