中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2015年
9期
824-827
,共4页
复发性抑郁缓解期个体%抑郁情绪个体%注意偏向%眼动
複髮性抑鬱緩解期箇體%抑鬱情緒箇體%註意偏嚮%眼動
복발성억욱완해기개체%억욱정서개체%주의편향%안동
Individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression%Depressed individuals%Attentional bias%Eye movement
目的 通过分析眼动指标来探讨复发性抑郁缓解期个体对情绪面孔图片的注意偏向.方法 流调用抑郁自评量表(Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale,CES-D)筛选正常个体24人和抑郁情绪个体21人,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Hamilton depression scale-17,HAMD-17)筛选复发性抑郁缓解期个体24人,通过分析被试的眼动指标来探讨复发性抑郁缓解期个体的注意偏向机制.结果 复发性抑郁缓解组对高兴面孔首视点持续时间偏向分数[(52.60±0.06)％]显著小于抑郁情绪组[(59.26±0.09)％]和正常组[(53.27±0.07)％],差异有统计学意义(F(1.66)=12.32,7.23,P＜0.05).复发性抑郁缓解组对悲伤面孔的总注视时间偏向分数[(59.17±0.08)％]大于正常组[(49.67±0.07)％],差异有统计学意义(Ff1..)=4.29,P＜0.05).结论 复发性抑郁缓解组被试对悲伤面孔和高兴面孔都没有表现出最初的定向偏向;复发性抑郁缓解组对悲伤面孔表现出最初的注意逃避和总体的注意维持.
目的 通過分析眼動指標來探討複髮性抑鬱緩解期箇體對情緒麵孔圖片的註意偏嚮.方法 流調用抑鬱自評量錶(Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale,CES-D)篩選正常箇體24人和抑鬱情緒箇體21人,漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(Hamilton depression scale-17,HAMD-17)篩選複髮性抑鬱緩解期箇體24人,通過分析被試的眼動指標來探討複髮性抑鬱緩解期箇體的註意偏嚮機製.結果 複髮性抑鬱緩解組對高興麵孔首視點持續時間偏嚮分數[(52.60±0.06)％]顯著小于抑鬱情緒組[(59.26±0.09)％]和正常組[(53.27±0.07)％],差異有統計學意義(F(1.66)=12.32,7.23,P＜0.05).複髮性抑鬱緩解組對悲傷麵孔的總註視時間偏嚮分數[(59.17±0.08)％]大于正常組[(49.67±0.07)％],差異有統計學意義(Ff1..)=4.29,P＜0.05).結論 複髮性抑鬱緩解組被試對悲傷麵孔和高興麵孔都沒有錶現齣最初的定嚮偏嚮;複髮性抑鬱緩解組對悲傷麵孔錶現齣最初的註意逃避和總體的註意維持.
목적 통과분석안동지표래탐토복발성억욱완해기개체대정서면공도편적주의편향.방법 류조용억욱자평량표(Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale,CES-D)사선정상개체24인화억욱정서개체21인,한밀이돈억욱량표(Hamilton depression scale-17,HAMD-17)사선복발성억욱완해기개체24인,통과분석피시적안동지표래탐토복발성억욱완해기개체적주의편향궤제.결과 복발성억욱완해조대고흥면공수시점지속시간편향분수[(52.60±0.06)％]현저소우억욱정서조[(59.26±0.09)％]화정상조[(53.27±0.07)％],차이유통계학의의(F(1.66)=12.32,7.23,P＜0.05).복발성억욱완해조대비상면공적총주시시간편향분수[(59.17±0.08)％]대우정상조[(49.67±0.07)％],차이유통계학의의(Ff1..)=4.29,P＜0.05).결론 복발성억욱완해조피시대비상면공화고흥면공도몰유표현출최초적정향편향;복발성억욱완해조대비상면공표현출최초적주의도피화총체적주의유지.
Objective To explore the attentional bias to emotional faces on individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression through eye-tracking study.Methods Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) were used to the diagnosis of 24 normal individuals and 21 depressed individuals and 24 individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression.Emotion face pictures were chosen as experiment material and discuss the mechanism of the attentional bias of individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression through the analysis of eye movement index.Results First fixation duration bias score on happy expression picture of individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression((52.60±0.06) ％) was less than normal controls ((59.26±0.09) ％) and the depression group((53.27±0.07)％),(F(1.66)=12.32,7.23,P＜0.05).Gaze Duration Bias score on sad expression picture of individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression ((59.17±0.08) ％) was more than normal controls((49.67±0.07) ％),(F(1.66) =4.29,P＜0.05).Conclusion Individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression show no original direction bias to sad and happy expression pictures.Original attentional avoidance and total attentional maintenance to sad expression picture exist in individuals in the remitted phase of recurrent depression.
