CAJ | 학술논문

采用格莱斯的合作原则和会话含义理论分析了《圣经·约伯记》中上帝与约伯的两轮对话及会话准则违反现象。结果表明：上帝并没有直接回应约伯问及受苦和不公的问题，而是故意违反合作原则的关联准则、方式准则和质量准则来传递会话深层含义以使约伯推导出上帝以间接含蓄的方式充分回应了约伯的指控和质疑。从语用学角度分析《圣经·约伯记》中的人物对话隐藏含义有助于理解隐晦、含蓄的人神对话的深层意义。
채용격래사적합작원칙화회화함의이론분석료《골경·약백기》중상제여약백적량륜대화급회화준칙위반현상。결과표명：상제병몰유직접회응약백문급수고화불공적문제，이시고의위반합작원칙적관련준칙、방식준칙화질량준칙래전체회화심층함의이사약백추도출상제이간접함축적방식충분회응료약백적지공화질의。종어용학각도분석《골경·약백기》중적인물대화은장함의유조우리해은회、함축적인신대화적심층의의。
Grice’s cooperative principle and conversational implicature were adopted to analyze two rounds dia?logues in maxims violation between God and Job in the Book of Job, Bible. The results indicates that: God did not di?rectly respond to the questions of suffering and injustice Job asked, but deliberately violated the principles of cooper?ation related to relevance, manner and quality to convey conversational implicature to make Job deduce that God ful?ly responded to Job’s allegations and questions in an indirect manner. Analyzing characters’conversational implica?ture from pragmatic perspective helps to understand the deep meanings of obscure and subtle dialogues between man and God.