福建警察学院学报
福建警察學院學報
복건경찰학원학보
Journal of Fujian Police Academy
2015年
4期
21-26
,共6页
盗租房屋%使用权%不当得利%使用盗窃
盜租房屋%使用權%不噹得利%使用盜竊
도조방옥%사용권%불당득리%사용도절
stealing the house to rent%right to use%illegal profit%using the stole house
关于盗窃罪的犯罪对象在理论界一直争论不休。冒充房主将房屋出租给不知情的善意第三人的行为如何定性,理论界有多种观点,分别是构成盗窃罪、侵占罪、诈骗罪,非法侵入住宅罪,还有观点认为不构成犯罪,属于民事上的不当得利。根据我国的刑法理论和司法实践,在目前的刑法学法律框架下,此类盗用行为只能按无罪处理。然而,现实中此类案件发生频率和社会危害性均呈增长趋势,仅仅靠传统的民事制裁已经有些力不从心,将其引入刑法的规制范围刻不容缓,这需要修改现行的刑法条文,单独设立“使用盗窃罪”。
關于盜竊罪的犯罪對象在理論界一直爭論不休。冒充房主將房屋齣租給不知情的善意第三人的行為如何定性,理論界有多種觀點,分彆是構成盜竊罪、侵佔罪、詐騙罪,非法侵入住宅罪,還有觀點認為不構成犯罪,屬于民事上的不噹得利。根據我國的刑法理論和司法實踐,在目前的刑法學法律框架下,此類盜用行為隻能按無罪處理。然而,現實中此類案件髮生頻率和社會危害性均呈增長趨勢,僅僅靠傳統的民事製裁已經有些力不從心,將其引入刑法的規製範圍刻不容緩,這需要脩改現行的刑法條文,單獨設立“使用盜竊罪”。
관우도절죄적범죄대상재이론계일직쟁론불휴。모충방주장방옥출조급불지정적선의제삼인적행위여하정성,이론계유다충관점,분별시구성도절죄、침점죄、사편죄,비법침입주택죄,환유관점인위불구성범죄,속우민사상적불당득리。근거아국적형법이론화사법실천,재목전적형법학법률광가하,차류도용행위지능안무죄처리。연이,현실중차류안건발생빈솔화사회위해성균정증장추세,부부고전통적민사제재이경유사력불종심,장기인입형법적규제범위각불용완,저수요수개현행적형법조문,단독설립“사용도절죄”。
The object of the crime of theft has always been a hot issue in the theoretical circle. Actually the theorists have held different opinions on the nature of the behavior of posing as the house owner and renting the sto-len house to uninformed bona fide third party. It may be the crime of theft, the crime of embezzlement, the crime of fraud, the crime of illegally invading a residence or it may not be a crime, but just having the illegal profit. However, according to our country's criminal law theory and the judicial practice, this kind of embezzlement can only be defined as innocent under the current criminal law frame. As such cases are occurring thick and fast in the real life and more and more social harmfulness has been caused, the traditional civil sanctions seem inadequate. Therefore, we should immediately amend the current criminal law to establish the crime of"using the stolen house"so that the criminal law can apply to such behaviors.