中华超声影像学杂志
中華超聲影像學雜誌
중화초성영상학잡지
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2015年
9期
805-808
,共4页
李柳军%贺需旗%郑荣琴%李凯%许尔蛟%关佩珊%苏中振
李柳軍%賀需旂%鄭榮琴%李凱%許爾蛟%關珮珊%囌中振
리류군%하수기%정영금%리개%허이교%관패산%소중진
超声检查%图像融合%体层摄影术,X 线计算机%电磁定位%体模
超聲檢查%圖像融閤%體層攝影術,X 線計算機%電磁定位%體模
초성검사%도상융합%체층섭영술,X 선계산궤%전자정위%체모
Ultrasonography%Image fusion%Tomography,X-ray computed%Electromagnetic positioning%Phantom
目的:比较分析三维超声-二维超声(3DUS-US)与 CT-二维超声(CT-US)磁定位图像融合技术的准确性、简便性及可重复性。方法建立仿组织体模,两位不同经验操作者分别进行3DUS-US、CT-US 图像融合,各重复操作10次,分别记录图像融合成功率、融合时间和配准误差,并比较上述指标在两位操作者、两种技术之间的差异。结果体模的超声、CT 图像及其稳定性均满足实验要求。3DUS-US、CT-US 融合均获得成功,3DUS-US 融合的配准误差(1.70±0.42)mm、融合时间(76.00±9.99)s 均明显优于 CT-US (P =0.014,P <0.001)。3DUS-US 融合配准误差、融合时间在两位操作者之间的比较差异均无统计学意义(P =0.508,P =0.517);而 CT-US 融合的配准误差在经验者明显低于初学者(P =0.009),融合时间两位操作者间差异则无统计学意义(P =0.234)。结论磁定位3DUS-US 图像自动融合技术在体模试验中较 CT-US 图像融合具有操作简便、无经验依赖等优势,更适合在临床上应用推广。
目的:比較分析三維超聲-二維超聲(3DUS-US)與 CT-二維超聲(CT-US)磁定位圖像融閤技術的準確性、簡便性及可重複性。方法建立倣組織體模,兩位不同經驗操作者分彆進行3DUS-US、CT-US 圖像融閤,各重複操作10次,分彆記錄圖像融閤成功率、融閤時間和配準誤差,併比較上述指標在兩位操作者、兩種技術之間的差異。結果體模的超聲、CT 圖像及其穩定性均滿足實驗要求。3DUS-US、CT-US 融閤均穫得成功,3DUS-US 融閤的配準誤差(1.70±0.42)mm、融閤時間(76.00±9.99)s 均明顯優于 CT-US (P =0.014,P <0.001)。3DUS-US 融閤配準誤差、融閤時間在兩位操作者之間的比較差異均無統計學意義(P =0.508,P =0.517);而 CT-US 融閤的配準誤差在經驗者明顯低于初學者(P =0.009),融閤時間兩位操作者間差異則無統計學意義(P =0.234)。結論磁定位3DUS-US 圖像自動融閤技術在體模試驗中較 CT-US 圖像融閤具有操作簡便、無經驗依賴等優勢,更適閤在臨床上應用推廣。
목적:비교분석삼유초성-이유초성(3DUS-US)여 CT-이유초성(CT-US)자정위도상융합기술적준학성、간편성급가중복성。방법건립방조직체모,량위불동경험조작자분별진행3DUS-US、CT-US 도상융합,각중복조작10차,분별기록도상융합성공솔、융합시간화배준오차,병비교상술지표재량위조작자、량충기술지간적차이。결과체모적초성、CT 도상급기은정성균만족실험요구。3DUS-US、CT-US 융합균획득성공,3DUS-US 융합적배준오차(1.70±0.42)mm、융합시간(76.00±9.99)s 균명현우우 CT-US (P =0.014,P <0.001)。3DUS-US 융합배준오차、융합시간재량위조작자지간적비교차이균무통계학의의(P =0.508,P =0.517);이 CT-US 융합적배준오차재경험자명현저우초학자(P =0.009),융합시간량위조작자간차이칙무통계학의의(P =0.234)。결론자정위3DUS-US 도상자동융합기술재체모시험중교 CT-US 도상융합구유조작간편、무경험의뢰등우세,경괄합재림상상응용추엄。
Objective To compare the accuracy,convenience and repeatability of 3DUS-US and CT-US image fusion technology based on electromagnetic positioning.Methods A tissue-mimicking phantom was established and used to obtain ultrasound or CT volume images.Two different operators performed 3DUS-US and CT-US image fusion and repeated 10 times,respectively.The success rate,the registration error distance and fusion time of two techniques were recorded and compared between the different operators.Results The ultrasound and CT images of the phantom and its stability could meet the demands of this experiment.3DUS-US and CT-US image fusions were successful.The registration error distance of 3DUS-US image fusion was (1 .70 ± 0.42)mm and fusion time was (76.00 ± 9.99)s,they were obviously superior to CT-US (P = 0.014,P < 0.001 ).There were no significant differences between the two operators in the registration error distance and fusion time of 3DUS-US (P =0.508,P =0.5 1 7).But the registration error distance of CT-US image fusion in experienced operator was lower than the junior (P =0.009),and fusion time had not statistical difference between the two operators (P =0.234).Conclusions The technique of 3DUS-US automatic image fusion based on electromagnetic positioning has advantages of convenience and no experiential dependence comparing with CT-US in the phantom experiments,so it is worthy of being widely popularized in clinical application.