中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
China Continuing Medical Education
2015年
29期
63-64
,共2页
头颅磁共振血管造影%原发性蛛网膜下腔出血%诊断价值
頭顱磁共振血管造影%原髮性蛛網膜下腔齣血%診斷價值
두로자공진혈관조영%원발성주망막하강출혈%진단개치
Head magnetic resonance angiography%Primary subarachnoid hemorrhage%Diagnostic value
目的：对头颅共振血管造影在原发性蛛网膜下腔出血病因诊断中的价值分析。方法将医院2013年2月～2015年2月收治的52例原发性蛛网膜下腔出血患者作为研究对象，均采用多排螺旋CT与头颅磁共振血管造影，并对两种检查技术的诊断符合情况进行分析比较。结果患者行头颅磁共振血管造影的诊断准确率为98.08%（51/52），高于多排螺旋CT的诊断符合率84.62%（44/52），P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义。结论头颅磁共振血管造影对原发性蛛网膜下腔出血的诊断准确率及病因评价要优于多排螺旋CT，前者具有较高的临床应用价值。
目的：對頭顱共振血管造影在原髮性蛛網膜下腔齣血病因診斷中的價值分析。方法將醫院2013年2月～2015年2月收治的52例原髮性蛛網膜下腔齣血患者作為研究對象，均採用多排螺鏇CT與頭顱磁共振血管造影，併對兩種檢查技術的診斷符閤情況進行分析比較。結果患者行頭顱磁共振血管造影的診斷準確率為98.08%（51/52），高于多排螺鏇CT的診斷符閤率84.62%（44/52），P＜0.05，差異具有統計學意義。結論頭顱磁共振血管造影對原髮性蛛網膜下腔齣血的診斷準確率及病因評價要優于多排螺鏇CT，前者具有較高的臨床應用價值。
목적：대두로공진혈관조영재원발성주망막하강출혈병인진단중적개치분석。방법장의원2013년2월～2015년2월수치적52례원발성주망막하강출혈환자작위연구대상，균채용다배라선CT여두로자공진혈관조영，병대량충검사기술적진단부합정황진행분석비교。결과환자행두로자공진혈관조영적진단준학솔위98.08%（51/52），고우다배라선CT적진단부합솔84.62%（44/52），P＜0.05，차이구유통계학의의。결론두로자공진혈관조영대원발성주망막하강출혈적진단준학솔급병인평개요우우다배라선CT，전자구유교고적림상응용개치。
Objective To analysis the headmagnetic resonance angiography indiagnosis of primary subarachnoid hemorrhage.Methods Selected 52 caseswith primary subarachnoid hemorrhage from February 2013 to February 2015 in our hospital as the object, all of them were adopt multi-spiral CT and head magnetic resonance angiography, compared and analyzed the diagnose conform condition of two types check technological. Results The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography was 98.08% (51/52), higher than the skull row spiral CT diagnose accordance rate was 84.62% (44/52),P<0.05, had difference statistically signiifcance. Conclusion Cranial magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of primary subarachnoid hemorrhage accuracy, and the evaluation of the cause is much better than row helical CT, the former has higher clinical value.
