中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)
中華危重癥醫學雜誌(電子版)
중화위중증의학잡지(전자판)
Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine (Electronic Edition)
2015年
5期
273-278
,共6页
李玉玲%张彧%邢静%李锐%高冬娜%杨娑娑%张健
李玉玲%張彧%邢靜%李銳%高鼕娜%楊娑娑%張健
리옥령%장욱%형정%리예%고동나%양사사%장건
原花青素B1%脂多糖类%炎症
原花青素B1%脂多糖類%炎癥
원화청소B1%지다당류%염증
Procyanidin B1%Lipopolysaccharides%Inflammation
目的:探索原花青素B1的抗炎活性及其抗炎机制。方法以人急性单核细胞白血病细胞系(THP-1)为模型,设立不含脂多糖(LPS)的磷酸盐缓冲溶液(PBS)处理THP-1细胞为对照组,检测不同浓度原花青素B1(50、100、150、200 mg/L)对THP-1细胞活力的影响。分别应用1 mg/L的LPS(LPS组)、1 mg/L的LPS联合原花青素B150 mg/L(处理A组)、1 mg/L的LPS联合原花青素B1100 mg/L(处理B组)预处理THP-1细胞,收集各组THP-1细胞上清液,应用双抗体夹心亲和素-生物素-过氧化物酶复合物-酶联免疫吸附法测定各组THP-1细胞中TNF-α的释放水平。应用实时定量PCR法测定各组THP-1细胞MyD88 mRNA和髓样分化蛋白2(MD-2) mRNA的表达情况。结果不同浓度原花青素的THP-1细胞活力与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=31.35,P<0.001),进一步比较发现,50、100 mg/L原花青素的THP-1细胞活力与对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),而150、200 mg/L原花青素的THP-1细胞活力均明显低于对照组(P均<0.05)。处理A、B组的TNF-α水平较LPS组均显著减低(P均<0.05),且处理B较处理A组下降更为明显(P<0.05)。对照组、LPS组及处理A组间MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA的表达差异均有统计学意义(F=62.500、46.700,P均<0.001),且LPS组的MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA表达均较对照组及处理A组明显升高(P均<0.05),处理A组的MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA表达高于对照组(P均<0.05)。结论原花青素B1可明显抑制LPS介导的炎症反应,负性调节Toll样受体-MyD88信号通路,可能是其抑制炎症反应的潜在机制。
目的:探索原花青素B1的抗炎活性及其抗炎機製。方法以人急性單覈細胞白血病細胞繫(THP-1)為模型,設立不含脂多糖(LPS)的燐痠鹽緩遲溶液(PBS)處理THP-1細胞為對照組,檢測不同濃度原花青素B1(50、100、150、200 mg/L)對THP-1細胞活力的影響。分彆應用1 mg/L的LPS(LPS組)、1 mg/L的LPS聯閤原花青素B150 mg/L(處理A組)、1 mg/L的LPS聯閤原花青素B1100 mg/L(處理B組)預處理THP-1細胞,收集各組THP-1細胞上清液,應用雙抗體夾心親和素-生物素-過氧化物酶複閤物-酶聯免疫吸附法測定各組THP-1細胞中TNF-α的釋放水平。應用實時定量PCR法測定各組THP-1細胞MyD88 mRNA和髓樣分化蛋白2(MD-2) mRNA的錶達情況。結果不同濃度原花青素的THP-1細胞活力與對照組比較,差異有統計學意義(F=31.35,P<0.001),進一步比較髮現,50、100 mg/L原花青素的THP-1細胞活力與對照組比較差異均無統計學意義(P均>0.05),而150、200 mg/L原花青素的THP-1細胞活力均明顯低于對照組(P均<0.05)。處理A、B組的TNF-α水平較LPS組均顯著減低(P均<0.05),且處理B較處理A組下降更為明顯(P<0.05)。對照組、LPS組及處理A組間MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA的錶達差異均有統計學意義(F=62.500、46.700,P均<0.001),且LPS組的MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA錶達均較對照組及處理A組明顯升高(P均<0.05),處理A組的MyD88 mRNA和MD-2 mRNA錶達高于對照組(P均<0.05)。結論原花青素B1可明顯抑製LPS介導的炎癥反應,負性調節Toll樣受體-MyD88信號通路,可能是其抑製炎癥反應的潛在機製。
목적:탐색원화청소B1적항염활성급기항염궤제。방법이인급성단핵세포백혈병세포계(THP-1)위모형,설립불함지다당(LPS)적린산염완충용액(PBS)처리THP-1세포위대조조,검측불동농도원화청소B1(50、100、150、200 mg/L)대THP-1세포활력적영향。분별응용1 mg/L적LPS(LPS조)、1 mg/L적LPS연합원화청소B150 mg/L(처리A조)、1 mg/L적LPS연합원화청소B1100 mg/L(처리B조)예처리THP-1세포,수집각조THP-1세포상청액,응용쌍항체협심친화소-생물소-과양화물매복합물-매련면역흡부법측정각조THP-1세포중TNF-α적석방수평。응용실시정량PCR법측정각조THP-1세포MyD88 mRNA화수양분화단백2(MD-2) mRNA적표체정황。결과불동농도원화청소적THP-1세포활력여대조조비교,차이유통계학의의(F=31.35,P<0.001),진일보비교발현,50、100 mg/L원화청소적THP-1세포활력여대조조비교차이균무통계학의의(P균>0.05),이150、200 mg/L원화청소적THP-1세포활력균명현저우대조조(P균<0.05)。처리A、B조적TNF-α수평교LPS조균현저감저(P균<0.05),차처리B교처리A조하강경위명현(P<0.05)。대조조、LPS조급처리A조간MyD88 mRNA화MD-2 mRNA적표체차이균유통계학의의(F=62.500、46.700,P균<0.001),차LPS조적MyD88 mRNA화MD-2 mRNA표체균교대조조급처리A조명현승고(P균<0.05),처리A조적MyD88 mRNA화MD-2 mRNA표체고우대조조(P균<0.05)。결론원화청소B1가명현억제LPS개도적염증반응,부성조절Toll양수체-MyD88신호통로,가능시기억제염증반응적잠재궤제。
Objective To investigate the anti-inflammatory effect of procyanidin B1 and the underlied mechanisms. Methods This study performed in human acute monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1) cells, excluding lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) with THP-1 cells as the control group, the THP-1 cell activity in different concentration of procyanidins B1 (50, 100, 150, 200 mg / L) were detected and compared. THP-1 cells were treated with 1 mg/L LPS (LPS group), 1 mg/L LPS joint 50 mg/L procyanidin B1 (group A), 1 mg/L LPS joint 100 mg/L procyanidin B1 (group B), respectively. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the supernatants were examined by double-antibody sandwich avidin-biotin-pcroxidase complex enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. The expression of MyD88 mRNA and myeloid differential protein 2 (MD-2) mRNA were performed by real-time PCR. Results The cell viability of procyanidins B1 in different concentration were significantly different as compared with the control group (F=31.35, P<0.001), and the cell viability of procyanidins B1 with 50, 100 mg / L showed no significant differences as compared with the control group (all P>0.05), the cell viability of procyanidins B1 with 150 and 200 mg/L were much lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The levels of TNF-α in group A and group B were lower than those in the LPS group, and was the lowest in the group B (all P < 0.05). The expression of MyD88 mRNA and MD-2 mRNA in the control group, LPS group and group A all showed significant difference (F=62.500, 46.700, all P<0.001), and were much higher in the LPS group than those in the control group and group A, and were higher in the group A than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion Procyanidin B1 can inhibit LPS-induced inflammatory response through negative modulation Toll-like receptor-MyD88 signaling pathway.