国际心血管病杂志
國際心血管病雜誌
국제심혈관병잡지
International Journal of Cardiovascular Disease
2015年
5期
360-362
,共3页
陈芝蔷%陈永清%张卫泽%余静%白锋
陳芝薔%陳永清%張衛澤%餘靜%白鋒
진지장%진영청%장위택%여정%백봉
起搏器%预防性%抗生素%围手术期
起搏器%預防性%抗生素%圍手術期
기박기%예방성%항생소%위수술기
Pacemaker%Preventability%Antibiotic%Perioperative period
目的:回顾性分析永久起搏器置入患者围术期不同方式预防性应用抗生素的疗效。方法:收集兰州大学第二医院心内科和兰州军区总医院心内科行永久起搏器置入术的722例患者的临床资料,根据抗生素用药方案分为4组。A 组( n=187)、B组(n=183)、C组(n=174)均在术前30 min~1 h预防性静脉滴注抗生素1次,术后A组使用抗生素平均(6.52±1.13)d,B组使用3 d,C组术后未使用,D组(n=178)术前、术后均未使用抗生素。4组患者术后第1、3、5天常规各换敷料1次,住院期间观察手术切口和囊袋,并分别在术后1个月、3个月门诊或电话随访1次。结果:4组患者术后发热、切口红肿及囊袋积血发生率及感染率均无显著差异。结论:延长预防性使用抗生素疗程未能显著降低永久起搏器置入患者感染发生率。
目的:迴顧性分析永久起搏器置入患者圍術期不同方式預防性應用抗生素的療效。方法:收集蘭州大學第二醫院心內科和蘭州軍區總醫院心內科行永久起搏器置入術的722例患者的臨床資料,根據抗生素用藥方案分為4組。A 組( n=187)、B組(n=183)、C組(n=174)均在術前30 min~1 h預防性靜脈滴註抗生素1次,術後A組使用抗生素平均(6.52±1.13)d,B組使用3 d,C組術後未使用,D組(n=178)術前、術後均未使用抗生素。4組患者術後第1、3、5天常規各換敷料1次,住院期間觀察手術切口和囊袋,併分彆在術後1箇月、3箇月門診或電話隨訪1次。結果:4組患者術後髮熱、切口紅腫及囊袋積血髮生率及感染率均無顯著差異。結論:延長預防性使用抗生素療程未能顯著降低永久起搏器置入患者感染髮生率。
목적:회고성분석영구기박기치입환자위술기불동방식예방성응용항생소적료효。방법:수집란주대학제이의원심내과화란주군구총의원심내과행영구기박기치입술적722례환자적림상자료,근거항생소용약방안분위4조。A 조( n=187)、B조(n=183)、C조(n=174)균재술전30 min~1 h예방성정맥적주항생소1차,술후A조사용항생소평균(6.52±1.13)d,B조사용3 d,C조술후미사용,D조(n=178)술전、술후균미사용항생소。4조환자술후제1、3、5천상규각환부료1차,주원기간관찰수술절구화낭대,병분별재술후1개월、3개월문진혹전화수방1차。결과:4조환자술후발열、절구홍종급낭대적혈발생솔급감염솔균무현저차이。결론:연장예방성사용항생소료정미능현저강저영구기박기치입환자감염발생솔。
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the features of antibiotic use in preoperative period of permanent cardiac pacemaker . Methods:A total of 722 patients with single ,dual and three chamber cardiac pacemaker from Cardiology Department of the second Hospital affiliated to Lanzhou University and Cardiology Department of General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Command between January 2010 and December 2013 were enrolled . According to the different antibiotic therapeutic regimens ,the patients were divided into group A(n= 178) ,group B(n=183) ,group C(n=174) and group D(n= 178) .In group A ,B and C ,the patients were administered intravenously prophylactic antibiotics 30 min~1 h before the surgery .The durations of antibiotic use in group A and group B were (6 .52 ± 1 .13) d three days ,respectively .We changed the dressing for all patients on the first ,third and fifth day after surgery ,observed condition of surgical incision and pocket during hospitalization stay ,and followed up at the first and third month respectively after the surgery in outpatient department or by telephone . Results:There were no statistical differences among these four groups in postoperative fever rate ,surgical incision swelling and infection rate of the pocket hematocele . Conclusion:Prolonged prophylactic antibiotics treatment fails to decrease the incidence of infection in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation .