CAJ | 학술논문

清初文人王士祯为《聊斋志异》题写的一首七绝诗(简称“聊斋题诗”)，是周作人屡次援引的古典文学资源，这一“聊斋情结”被其弟子废名或明或晦地记录于《枣》《桥》等小说中。对“聊斋题诗”背后的资源传统及其与周作人思想的复杂关联加以考释，可以见出周作人研究中尚未被充分关注的若干面向。通过对“聊斋题诗”所蕴藏的“传统”进行挪用和发明，周作人以期确立并坚守自由主义立场，并不断对迷信、道统、科学崇拜等思维禁锢，以及权威、主流等思想统制加以警惕和批判，由此回应新文化人的启蒙理想。
청초문인왕사정위《료재지이》제사적일수칠절시(간칭“료재제시”)，시주작인루차원인적고전문학자원，저일“료재정결”피기제자폐명혹명혹회지기록우《조》《교》등소설중。대“료재제시”배후적자원전통급기여주작인사상적복잡관련가이고석，가이견출주작인연구중상미피충분관주적약간면향。통과대“료재제시”소온장적“전통”진행나용화발명，주작인이기학립병견수자유주의립장，병불단대미신、도통、과학숭배등사유금고，이급권위、주류등사상통제가이경척화비판，유차회응신문화인적계몽이상。
Wang Shizhen, a famous scholar in the early Qing Dynasty, inscribed a seven-character quatrain to Pu Songling's Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio (Liaochai Ti Shi). The poem was quoted frequently by Zhou Zuoren, whose Liaochai Complex was either spelt explicitly or hinted at in his disciple Fei Ming's fictions Jujube (《枣》) and Bridge (《桥》). This paper investigates the tradition underlying Liaochai Ti Shi and the poem's complicated role in Zhou Zuoren's thoughts, in an attempt to reveal some neglected aspects of Zhou Zuoren Studies. Through incorporating and adapting the tradition behind Liaochai Ti Shi in his own works, Zhou Zuoren established and defended a liberal ground that warned against mental fetters including superstition, Confucian orthodoxy, worship of sciences, and the domineering authority of mainstream ideas. Thus he responded to the enlightenment ideal of his New Cultural compatriots.