CAJ | 학술논문

损害商业信誉、商品声誉的新闻有偿行为被追究刑事责任应满足的要件为：媒体舆论是否充当商业不正当竞争工具；毁损声誉的结果是否出于直接故意；侵害行为所担之责是否符合“罚当其过”。记者有偿新闻行为构成“敲诈勒索罪”或“受贿罪”，虽然司法实践对敲诈勒索罪、受贿罪的法律适用存在可替换性，但适用受贿罪的案件比例增多，表明法律机关打击有偿新闻的力度增加。“为他人谋取利益”是非法收受他人财物构成“受贿罪”的必备要件，而非主动索贿构成“受贿罪”的要件。正面典型报道中的交易行为属非索贿型受贿罪，不具备“为他人谋取利益”构成条件，如何准确适用法律成为新的问题。
손해상업신예、상품성예적신문유상행위피추구형사책임응만족적요건위：매체여론시부충당상업불정당경쟁공구；훼손성예적결과시부출우직접고의；침해행위소담지책시부부합“벌당기과”。기자유상신문행위구성“고사륵색죄”혹“수회죄”，수연사법실천대고사륵색죄、수회죄적법률괄용존재가체환성，단괄용수회죄적안건비례증다，표명법률궤관타격유상신문적력도증가。“위타인모취이익”시비법수수타인재물구성“수회죄”적필비요건，이비주동색회구성“수회죄”적요건。정면전형보도중적교역행위속비색회형수회죄，불구비“위타인모취이익”구성조건，여하준학괄용법률성위신적문제。
The payoff journalism claimed for criminal liabilities when damaging to the reputation of the business and products should meet the following requirements :w hether the media opinion is a commercial tool for the unfair competition ;w hether the result of damage to the reputation is out of the direct intent ;whether the responsibility of infringement is consistent with the penalty .The payoff journalist can consti‐tute the crime of "extortion" or "bribery".Although the judicial practice is alternative of extortion and bribery ,the application cases of bribery have been increased ,w hich indicate the legal authorities'determi‐nation to fight the payoff journalism .The essential element of the bribery crime is seeking benefits for oth‐ers rather than extorting bribes initiatively .Therefore it is hard to make the applicable law for the trading behaviors behind the positive reports which can be regarded as the non‐extorting bribery crime .