运筹与管理
運籌與管理
운주여관리
Operations Research and Management Science
2015年
5期
116-125
,共10页
区位选址决策%倾向得分匹配%企业
區位選阯決策%傾嚮得分匹配%企業
구위선지결책%경향득분필배%기업
economic system and analysis%regional location decisions%propensity score matching%firm
新经济地理理论以及新近发展的“‘新’新经济地理理论”认为,高生产率企业通过集聚效应和选择效应存在于规模较大的市场,本文在后者理论框架下考察中国企业区位选址这一被忽视的问题。运用中国1999~2007年297个地级及以上城市100多万家企业的微观数据,采用倾向得分匹配方法克服样本选择性偏误,本文发现:相比低生产率企业组,高生产率企业选址于更大规模的城市。而且,这种选址倾向在不同区域和企业所有制上具有差异表现:相比传统中、西部地区,东部地区高生产率企业选址于大城市的倾向更为明显;相比集体企业,港澳台、外商及私营企业的这种倾向性更为显著,且估计结果显示国有企业选址不受全要素生产率水平的影响。以上发现为我国制造业企业区位选址决策的制定提供了新的思路。
新經濟地理理論以及新近髮展的“‘新’新經濟地理理論”認為,高生產率企業通過集聚效應和選擇效應存在于規模較大的市場,本文在後者理論框架下攷察中國企業區位選阯這一被忽視的問題。運用中國1999~2007年297箇地級及以上城市100多萬傢企業的微觀數據,採用傾嚮得分匹配方法剋服樣本選擇性偏誤,本文髮現:相比低生產率企業組,高生產率企業選阯于更大規模的城市。而且,這種選阯傾嚮在不同區域和企業所有製上具有差異錶現:相比傳統中、西部地區,東部地區高生產率企業選阯于大城市的傾嚮更為明顯;相比集體企業,港澳檯、外商及私營企業的這種傾嚮性更為顯著,且估計結果顯示國有企業選阯不受全要素生產率水平的影響。以上髮現為我國製造業企業區位選阯決策的製定提供瞭新的思路。
신경제지리이론이급신근발전적“‘신’신경제지리이론”인위,고생산솔기업통과집취효응화선택효응존재우규모교대적시장,본문재후자이론광가하고찰중국기업구위선지저일피홀시적문제。운용중국1999~2007년297개지급급이상성시100다만가기업적미관수거,채용경향득분필배방법극복양본선택성편오,본문발현:상비저생산솔기업조,고생산솔기업선지우경대규모적성시。이차,저충선지경향재불동구역화기업소유제상구유차이표현:상비전통중、서부지구,동부지구고생산솔기업선지우대성시적경향경위명현;상비집체기업,항오태、외상급사영기업적저충경향성경위현저,차고계결과현시국유기업선지불수전요소생산솔수평적영향。이상발현위아국제조업기업구위선지결책적제정제공료신적사로。
New Economic Geography and New New Economic Geography which is developed recently indicate that firms with higher tfp will select more larger markets through agglomeration effect and selection effect.This paper studies the problem of Chinese firms’ regional location based on the latter theory framework.Using more than one million firms’ records of Chinese 297 prefecture-level and above cities during 1999~2007 and propensity score matching method to solve the problem of selectivity bias,the results indicate that:comparing to firms with lower tfp,firms with more higher tfp select more larger cities.What’ s more,this location decision is different in differ-ent regions and firm’ s ownership:comparing to traditional central and western regions,the trend of higher tfp firms selecting larger cities is more obvious in eastern region.Comparing to collective firms, this trend of HMT ( Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) firms,foreign and private firms is more illustrious, and results show that state-owned firms’ regional location decision is not affected by tfp.The results above provide a new solution for the policy-making of Chinese manufacturing regional location.