CAJ | 학술논문

本文对目前出版界颇为盛行的"编校合一"制度进行了探讨.首先分析了"编校合一"的概念以及编辑与校对两个岗位的区别,并对越来越多的学术期刊实行"编校合一"的原因进行了分析,继而阐明了"编校合一"制度的科学性以及存在的弊端.认为在新时期下学术期刊实行"编校合一"制度具备科学性和可行性,其弊端可以通过合适的手段消除.
본문대목전출판계파위성행적"편교합일"제도진행료탐토.수선분석료"편교합일"적개념이급편집여교대량개강위적구별,병대월래월다적학술기간실행"편교합일"적원인진행료분석,계이천명료"편교합일"제도적과학성이급존재적폐단.인위재신시기하학술기간실행"편교합일"제도구비과학성화가행성,기폐단가이통과합괄적수단소제.
The"editing-proofreading integration"system prevail-ing in the current publishing field is explored in this paper. The definition of"editing-proofreading integration"and the difference between editing and proofreading are analyzed first, and the rea-sons why more and more academic journals are implementing"editing-proofreading integration" are also analyzed, and then the scientificalness and shortcomings of the "editing-proofread-ing integration"system are expounded. The writer holds that it is scientific and feasible to implement the"editing-proofreading in-tegration"system for academic journals in the new situation, and the shortcomings can be eliminated through appropriate means.