CAJ | 학술논문

作为常州派大家，陈廷焯一直是被世人以“沉郁”说解释接受的。事实上，泛读?白雨斋词话?就会发现，若从逻辑上说“本原”说更是他词学的理论核心。如果说“本原”说推进了常州派理论建设，那么他以屈骚作本原则有些偏颇。笔者以为它既不是中华诗词本原，也不能还原词中所包含的宋学意蕴。此应是陈廷焯的短视而为当代学人所忽视也。
작위상주파대가，진정작일직시피세인이“침욱”설해석접수적。사실상，범독?백우재사화?취회발현，약종라집상설“본원”설경시타사학적이론핵심。여과설“본원”설추진료상주파이론건설，나요타이굴소작본원칙유사편파。필자이위타기불시중화시사본원，야불능환원사중소포함적송학의온。차응시진정작적단시이위당대학인소홀시야。
As a great master of Changzhou school,Chen Ting-zhuo has been accepted as the “melancholy thought”.In fact,af-ter reading his Baiyuzaicihua,we can find that the “primitive thought”was his core poetic theory if it was seen from the logical aspect.If we say that the “primitive thought”promoted the theory building of Changzhou school,then he had some bias in the principle of his works of Chusao.The author thought that it is not the “primitive thought”of the Chinese poems and also could not restore to the original state of the meaning contained in the poems.This should be his short-sighted and ignored by the con-temporary scholars.