CAJ | 학술논문

目的分析中国农村6~11岁在校小学生忽视状况.方法于2012年12月至2013年3月,采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法,在全国抽取9个省份、28个县、56所农村小学的6~11岁小学生作为调查对象,共计7 943名.采用"中国农村6~8岁小学生忽视评价常模"与"中国农村9~11岁小学生忽视评价常模"制定的量表进行问卷调查,并分析不同年级、性别、家庭类型和不同忽视层面的忽视率与忽视度.结果中国农村6~8岁与9~11岁小学生总忽视率分别为40.2%(1 258/3 130)与42.5%(1 498/3 526)(χ2=3.59,P=0.058);总忽视度分别为46.04±8.87与44.78±10.43(t=5.01,P<0.001);6~8岁组男生忽视率和忽视度[分别为41.4%(657/1 587)和46.28 ± 8.76]与女生[分别为39.0%(601/1 543)和45.78±8.97]比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.87,P=0.171;t=1.49,P=0.136);9~11岁组男生忽视率和忽视度[分别为46.3%(816/1 763)和45.53±10.11]均高于女生[分别为38.7%(682/1 763)和44.06 ± 10.69](χ2=20.84 ,t=3.97 ,P值均<0.001).6~8岁组男生的社会层面忽视率[11.7%(198/1 691)]和教育层面的忽视度(48.09±9.70)高于女生[9.4%(155/1 648)、47.37±9.89],差异均有统计学意义(χ2=14.55,P<0.001,t=2.22,P=0.026);9~11岁组男生在身体层面的忽视率[20.4%(398/1 954)]高于女生[16.7%(326/1 957)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.92,P=0.003).结论中国农村6~11岁在校小学生受忽视状况严重,需进一步探讨其影响因素,并采取有效的干预措施.
목적 분석중국농촌6~11세재교소학생홀시상황.방법 우2012년12월지2013년3월,채용다계단분층정군추양방법,재전국추취9개성빈、28개현、56소농촌소학적6~11세소학생작위조사대상,공계7 943명.채용"중국농촌6~8세소학생홀시평개상모"여"중국농촌9~11세소학생홀시평개상모"제정적량표진행문권조사,병분석불동년급、성별、가정류형화불동홀시층면적홀시솔여홀시도.결과 중국농촌6~8세여9~11세소학생총홀시솔분별위40.2%(1 258/3 130)여42.5%(1 498/3 526)(χ2=3.59,P=0.058);총홀시도분별위46.04±8.87여44.78±10.43(t=5.01,P<0.001);6~8세조남생홀시솔화홀시도[분별위41.4%(657/1 587)화46.28 ± 8.76]여녀생[분별위39.0%(601/1 543)화45.78±8.97]비교,차이균무통계학의의(χ2=1.87,P=0.171;t=1.49,P=0.136);9~11세조남생홀시솔화홀시도[분별위46.3%(816/1 763)화45.53±10.11]균고우녀생[분별위38.7%(682/1 763)화44.06 ± 10.69](χ2=20.84 ,t=3.97 ,P치균<0.001).6~8세조남생적사회층면홀시솔[11.7%(198/1 691)]화교육층면적홀시도(48.09±9.70)고우녀생[9.4%(155/1 648)、47.37±9.89],차이균유통계학의의(χ2=14.55,P<0.001,t=2.22,P=0.026);9~11세조남생재신체층면적홀시솔[20.4%(398/1 954)]고우녀생[16.7%(326/1 957)],차이유통계학의의(χ2=8.92,P=0.003).결론 중국농촌6~11세재교소학생수홀시상황엄중,수진일보탐토기영향인소,병채취유효적간예조시.
Objective To analyze pupils' neglect status aged 6-11 years in China's rural. Methods According to the principle of multi-stage stratified cluster sampling, to extract 7 943 pupils aged 6-11 years for the survey from 56 primary schools in 28 counties in nine provinces, from December 2012 to March 2013. Proceed questionnaire survey by the scale from"Neglect Evaluation Norms for pupils aged 6-8 years in Rural Areas of China"and"Neglect Evaluation Norms for pupils aged 9-11 years in Rural Areas of China". And analyze neglect rates and neglect degrees of the different grades, gender, family types and different levels of neglect. Results The total neglect rate of China's rural pupils aged 6-8 and 9-11 years was 40.2% (1 258/ 3 130) and 42.5%(1 498/3 526) respectively, which differences had no statistical significant(χ2=3.59, P=0.058);the total neglect degree was 46.04 ± 8.87 and 44.78 ± 10.43 respectively,which differences had statistical significant(t=5.01,P<0.001);the differences of neglect rates and neglect degrees between male (41.4%(657/1 587)and 46.28 ± 8.76) and female (39.0%(601/1 543)and 45.78 ± 8.97) of aged 6-8 were all no statistical significant (χ2=1.87, P=0.171;t=1.49, P=0.136);the neglect rates and neglect degrees of male (46.3%(816/1 763)and 45.53±10.11) were higher than female (38.7%(682/1 763)and 44.06 ± 10.69) in the group of aged 9-11, which differences were all statistical significant (χ2=20.84, t=3.97, P<0.001);the male neglect rate in the group of aged 6-8 in social neglect (11.7%(198/1 691)) and the neglect degree in educational neglect (48.09 ± 9.70) were higher than female (9.4%(155/1 648) and 47.37 ± 9.89), which differences were all statistical significance (χ2=14.55, P<0.001, t=2.22, P=0.026), the male neglect rate in the group of aged 9-11 in physical neglect (20.4%(398/1 954))was higher than female (16.7%(326/1 957)), which differences had statistical significance(χ2=8.92,P=0.003). Conclusion The neglect status of Chinese pupils aged 6-11 years in rural was serious, and we should find out risk factors and provide efficient prevention measures.