CAJ | 학술논문

本文以丹麦哥本哈根步行区和重庆大坪片区作为研究样本，前者的步行网络建设被公认为是成功的，后者则代表了目前中国城市的普遍状况，二者的比对能直接展现出步行网络建设水平的差异。目前针对步行网络的量化分析方法要么是直接测算而不能反应迭代效果，要么偏重于拓扑关系而忽视了步行对非拓扑因素的敏感，本文提出了效率—选择模型，以步行所敏感的实际距离和交叉口流向为核心进行不同半径的迭代计算。研究结果显示，与哥本哈根步行区相比，重庆大坪片区的步行网络体系还有着较大差距；同时也可以看出，本文所用模型以及分析手段对于步行网络的量化研究和科学指导城市设计都是有益的。
본문이단맥가본합근보행구화중경대평편구작위연구양본，전자적보행망락건설피공인위시성공적，후자칙대표료목전중국성시적보편상황，이자적비대능직접전현출보행망락건설수평적차이。목전침대보행망락적양화분석방법요요시직접측산이불능반응질대효과，요요편중우탁복관계이홀시료보행대비탁복인소적민감，본문제출료효솔—선택모형，이보행소민감적실제거리화교차구류향위핵심진행불동반경적질대계산。연구결과현시，여가본합근보행구상비，중경대평편구적보행망락체계환유착교대차거；동시야가이간출，본문소용모형이급분석수단대우보행망락적양화연구화과학지도성시설계도시유익적。
In regard to the object of study, the comparison between a successful case in Europe and a case in China could remarkably reflect the difference of the level of pedestrian network construction. While in regard to the research method, the existing calculation techniques of pedestrian network neglect the iterative effect in the calculation process, or only focus on the topological relations rather than the sensitivity to the non-topological factors of the pedestrian behavior. This study takes the pedestrian zone in Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Daping district in Chongqing as the samples of study. By building up a Choice-Efficiency model, this study acquires data of the samples through field survey and open-source online maps. Applying ArcGIS as the analytical tool, the two samples are analyzed comparatively, mainly in the range of 400m and 800m walking distances. In the final analysis results, the pedestrian network system of Daping district in Chongqing is far less developed, compared to that in Copenhagen, in terms of the Choice-Efficiency model. In addition, the model and analytical method employed in this study are both of great utility for the quantitative research on pedestrian network, and the rational reference for urban design.