光谱学与光谱分析
光譜學與光譜分析
광보학여광보분석
Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
2015年
11期
3105-3110
,共6页
王松柏%张彦%安文汀%卫艳丽%王宇%双少敏
王鬆柏%張彥%安文汀%衛豔麗%王宇%雙少敏
왕송백%장언%안문정%위염려%왕우%쌍소민
量子点%磁弛豫时间%超顺磁纳米颗粒%免疫分析%沙门氏菌
量子點%磁弛豫時間%超順磁納米顆粒%免疫分析%沙門氏菌
양자점%자이예시간%초순자납미과립%면역분석%사문씨균
Quantum dots%Magnetic relaxation switch%Superparamagnetic nanoparticles%Immunoassay%Salmonella enterica
基于量子点和超顺磁纳米颗粒分别构建了沙门氏菌的荧光免疫和磁驰豫时间(magnetic resonance sw itch ,M RS )免疫传感的分析方法,并应用于水样中沙门氏菌的检测。在荧光免疫分析方法中,利用偶联有沙门氏菌捕获抗体的磁探针对样品中沙门氏菌进行富集,然后加入偶联有沙门氏菌检测抗体的量子点荧光探针,基于双抗夹心的模式对水样中沙门氏菌的含量进行了测定。量子点的荧光强度和样品中沙门氏菌的浓度呈正相关,检出限是102 cf u?m L‐1,检测时间为2 h。在M RS免疫反应过程中,偶联有沙门氏菌捕获抗体的超顺纳米磁珠会特异性地结合沙门氏菌,导致超顺纳米磁珠由原来的分散状态转变为聚集状态,从而引起其相邻水分子的质子横向弛豫时间(spin‐spin relaxation time , T2)的改变,通过测定 T2的改变量ΔT2实现水样中沙门氏菌的检测。结果表明MRS传感器检测沙门氏菌的检测限是103 cfu?mL‐1,检测时间是0.5 h。比较了这两种方法在检测沙门氏菌方面的优劣及应用潜力。
基于量子點和超順磁納米顆粒分彆構建瞭沙門氏菌的熒光免疫和磁馳豫時間(magnetic resonance sw itch ,M RS )免疫傳感的分析方法,併應用于水樣中沙門氏菌的檢測。在熒光免疫分析方法中,利用偶聯有沙門氏菌捕穫抗體的磁探針對樣品中沙門氏菌進行富集,然後加入偶聯有沙門氏菌檢測抗體的量子點熒光探針,基于雙抗夾心的模式對水樣中沙門氏菌的含量進行瞭測定。量子點的熒光彊度和樣品中沙門氏菌的濃度呈正相關,檢齣限是102 cf u?m L‐1,檢測時間為2 h。在M RS免疫反應過程中,偶聯有沙門氏菌捕穫抗體的超順納米磁珠會特異性地結閤沙門氏菌,導緻超順納米磁珠由原來的分散狀態轉變為聚集狀態,從而引起其相鄰水分子的質子橫嚮弛豫時間(spin‐spin relaxation time , T2)的改變,通過測定 T2的改變量ΔT2實現水樣中沙門氏菌的檢測。結果錶明MRS傳感器檢測沙門氏菌的檢測限是103 cfu?mL‐1,檢測時間是0.5 h。比較瞭這兩種方法在檢測沙門氏菌方麵的優劣及應用潛力。
기우양자점화초순자납미과립분별구건료사문씨균적형광면역화자치예시간(magnetic resonance sw itch ,M RS )면역전감적분석방법,병응용우수양중사문씨균적검측。재형광면역분석방법중,이용우련유사문씨균포획항체적자탐침대양품중사문씨균진행부집,연후가입우련유사문씨균검측항체적양자점형광탐침,기우쌍항협심적모식대수양중사문씨균적함량진행료측정。양자점적형광강도화양품중사문씨균적농도정정상관,검출한시102 cf u?m L‐1,검측시간위2 h。재M RS면역반응과정중,우련유사문씨균포획항체적초순납미자주회특이성지결합사문씨균,도치초순납미자주유원래적분산상태전변위취집상태,종이인기기상린수분자적질자횡향이예시간(spin‐spin relaxation time , T2)적개변,통과측정 T2적개변량ΔT2실현수양중사문씨균적검측。결과표명MRS전감기검측사문씨균적검측한시103 cfu?mL‐1,검측시간시0.5 h。비교료저량충방법재검측사문씨균방면적우렬급응용잠력。
Fluoroimmunoassay based on quantum dots(QDs) and magnetic relaxation switch (MRS) immunoassay based on su‐perparamagnetic nanoparticles(SMN) were constructed to detect Salmonella enterica(S .enterica) in water samples .In fluoro‐immunoassay ,magnetic beads was conjugated with S .enterica capture antibody (MB‐Ab2) to enrich S .enterica from sample solution ,then the QDs was conjugated with the S .enterica detection antibody (QDs‐Ab1) to detect S .enterica based on sand‐wich immunoassay format .And the fluorescence intensity is positive related to the bacteria concentration of the sample .Results showed that the limit of detection (LOD) of this method was 102 cfu?mL -1 and analysis time was 2 h .In MRS assay ,magnetic nanoparticle‐antibody conjugate (MN‐Ab1) can switch their dispersed and aggregated state in the presence of the target .This state of change can modulate the spin‐spin relaxation time (T2 ) of the neighboring water molecule .The change in T2 (ΔT2 ) posi‐tively correlates with the amount of the target in the sample .Thus ,ΔT2 can be used as a detection signal in MRS immunosen‐sors .Results showed that LOD of MRS sensor for S .enterica was 103 cfu?mL -1 and analysis time was 0.5 h .Two methods were compared in terms of advantages and disadvantages in detecting S .enterica .