中华耳科学杂志
中華耳科學雜誌
중화이과학잡지
Chinese Journal of Otology
2015年
3期
416-418
,共3页
张莉%刘冰%刘海红%郑军%陈敏%姜苏敏%张杰
張莉%劉冰%劉海紅%鄭軍%陳敏%薑囌敏%張傑
장리%류빙%류해홍%정군%진민%강소민%장걸
良性阵发性眩晕%高刺激率听性脑干反应%儿童
良性陣髮性眩暈%高刺激率聽性腦榦反應%兒童
량성진발성현훈%고자격솔은성뇌간반응%인동
benign paroxysmal vertigo%high stimulus rate auditory brainstem response%children
目的:探讨高刺激率听性脑干诱发电位(ABR)在诊断儿童良性阵发性眩晕(Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo of children,BPV)的临床价值。方法根据BPV诊断标准,选取BPV的儿童60例和非BPV对照组20例。BPV组根据眩晕病程进展分为2周内眩晕发作组和无眩晕发作组。所有入组病例行听力学检查,对纯音测听听阈阈值、声导抗、高刺激率ABR进行比较,分析BPV及对照组之间听力学特征差异。结果(1)BPV组60例患儿及对照组20例儿童纯音测听、声导抗检查结果全部正常,听力无显著性差异。(2)BPV组中高刺激率ABR异常率为41.7%(25/60),正常对照组高刺激率ABR异常率为0%(0/20),两者有统计学差异,P<0.01。BPV组中:2周内眩晕发作组和无眩晕发作组,分别进行高刺激率ABR检查:2周内眩晕发作组高刺激率ABR异常率为63.6%(21/33),而2周内无眩晕发作者高刺激率ABR异常率为14.8%(4/27),两者有统计学差异,P<0.01。结论高刺激率ABR与儿童BPV、尤其是发作期的BPV具有一定的相关性。
目的:探討高刺激率聽性腦榦誘髮電位(ABR)在診斷兒童良性陣髮性眩暈(Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo of children,BPV)的臨床價值。方法根據BPV診斷標準,選取BPV的兒童60例和非BPV對照組20例。BPV組根據眩暈病程進展分為2週內眩暈髮作組和無眩暈髮作組。所有入組病例行聽力學檢查,對純音測聽聽閾閾值、聲導抗、高刺激率ABR進行比較,分析BPV及對照組之間聽力學特徵差異。結果(1)BPV組60例患兒及對照組20例兒童純音測聽、聲導抗檢查結果全部正常,聽力無顯著性差異。(2)BPV組中高刺激率ABR異常率為41.7%(25/60),正常對照組高刺激率ABR異常率為0%(0/20),兩者有統計學差異,P<0.01。BPV組中:2週內眩暈髮作組和無眩暈髮作組,分彆進行高刺激率ABR檢查:2週內眩暈髮作組高刺激率ABR異常率為63.6%(21/33),而2週內無眩暈髮作者高刺激率ABR異常率為14.8%(4/27),兩者有統計學差異,P<0.01。結論高刺激率ABR與兒童BPV、尤其是髮作期的BPV具有一定的相關性。
목적:탐토고자격솔은성뇌간유발전위(ABR)재진단인동량성진발성현훈(Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo of children,BPV)적림상개치。방법근거BPV진단표준,선취BPV적인동60례화비BPV대조조20례。BPV조근거현훈병정진전분위2주내현훈발작조화무현훈발작조。소유입조병례행은역학검사,대순음측은은역역치、성도항、고자격솔ABR진행비교,분석BPV급대조조지간은역학특정차이。결과(1)BPV조60례환인급대조조20례인동순음측은、성도항검사결과전부정상,은력무현저성차이。(2)BPV조중고자격솔ABR이상솔위41.7%(25/60),정상대조조고자격솔ABR이상솔위0%(0/20),량자유통계학차이,P<0.01。BPV조중:2주내현훈발작조화무현훈발작조,분별진행고자격솔ABR검사:2주내현훈발작조고자격솔ABR이상솔위63.6%(21/33),이2주내무현훈발작자고자격솔ABR이상솔위14.8%(4/27),량자유통계학차이,P<0.01。결론고자격솔ABR여인동BPV、우기시발작기적BPV구유일정적상관성。
Objective To study correlation between high stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses and benign paroxysmal vertigo (BPV) in children. Methods Included in the study were 60 children with BPV and 20 normal children. The children with BPV were divided into two subgroups depending on whether there were attacks in past two weeks. Pure tone audiometry, acoustic immitance and high stimulus rate auditory brainstem response test were conducted in all groups, and the differences were analyzed. Results 1) Pure tone audiometry and acoustic immitance were normal in both BPV and normal control group. 2) The rate of abnor-mal high stimulus rate ABRs was 41.7 % (25/60) in BPV groups and 0% in the control group (p<0.01). 3) The rate of abnormal high stimulus rate ABRs was 63.6 % (21/33) in those with vertigo attacks in past 2 weeks and 14.8%(4/27) in those without vertigo attacks in past 2 weeks (p<0.01). Conclusions High stimu-lus rate ABR results appear to be correlated with BPV attacks in Children.