中华耳科学杂志
中華耳科學雜誌
중화이과학잡지
Chinese Journal of Otology
2015年
3期
403-406
,共4页
杨扬%周怡%张杰%刘冰%刘海红%张亚梅%刘世琳%张晓絮%陈敏
楊颺%週怡%張傑%劉冰%劉海紅%張亞梅%劉世琳%張曉絮%陳敏
양양%주이%장걸%류빙%류해홍%장아매%류세림%장효서%진민
万古霉素%听力学%儿童
萬古黴素%聽力學%兒童
만고매소%은역학%인동
Vancomycin%Audiology%Children
目的:观察万古霉素的使用对幼儿听力的影响。方法回顾分析于2014年1月至2014年6月北京儿童医院感染科收治的急性感染患儿,治疗方案中使用万古霉素的患儿22名,分别在用药前及用药后进行听力学检测,分析患儿用药前后、伴随用药、不同用药时长的听力阈值、阈值潜伏期情况;比较万古霉素近期药效对听力的影响;分析用药后肝肾功异常情况与听力学的关系。统计学方法为配对t检验或秩和检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果共纳入2月-59月患儿22名,中位数年龄为28月,所有患儿用药前后的听性脑干反应阈值、Ⅰ波、Ⅲ波、Ⅴ波潜伏期及Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期变化均无统计学差异;合并用药组(13例)和非合并用药组(9例),组间听力学变化无统计学差异;依据肝肾功能结果分正常组(14例)和异常组(8例),组间听力学变化无统计学差异;依据用药时长分小于10天组(12例),大于10天组(10例),组间听力学变化无统计学差异。结论1)万古霉素中短期的使用对幼儿的听力无明显损害;2)合并用药、用药时长、伴发的肝肾功能损害没有增加听力损害的风险。
目的:觀察萬古黴素的使用對幼兒聽力的影響。方法迴顧分析于2014年1月至2014年6月北京兒童醫院感染科收治的急性感染患兒,治療方案中使用萬古黴素的患兒22名,分彆在用藥前及用藥後進行聽力學檢測,分析患兒用藥前後、伴隨用藥、不同用藥時長的聽力閾值、閾值潛伏期情況;比較萬古黴素近期藥效對聽力的影響;分析用藥後肝腎功異常情況與聽力學的關繫。統計學方法為配對t檢驗或秩和檢驗,P<0.05為差異有統計學意義。結果共納入2月-59月患兒22名,中位數年齡為28月,所有患兒用藥前後的聽性腦榦反應閾值、Ⅰ波、Ⅲ波、Ⅴ波潛伏期及Ⅰ-Ⅴ波間期變化均無統計學差異;閤併用藥組(13例)和非閤併用藥組(9例),組間聽力學變化無統計學差異;依據肝腎功能結果分正常組(14例)和異常組(8例),組間聽力學變化無統計學差異;依據用藥時長分小于10天組(12例),大于10天組(10例),組間聽力學變化無統計學差異。結論1)萬古黴素中短期的使用對幼兒的聽力無明顯損害;2)閤併用藥、用藥時長、伴髮的肝腎功能損害沒有增加聽力損害的風險。
목적:관찰만고매소적사용대유인은력적영향。방법회고분석우2014년1월지2014년6월북경인동의원감염과수치적급성감염환인,치료방안중사용만고매소적환인22명,분별재용약전급용약후진행은역학검측,분석환인용약전후、반수용약、불동용약시장적은력역치、역치잠복기정황;비교만고매소근기약효대은력적영향;분석용약후간신공이상정황여은역학적관계。통계학방법위배대t검험혹질화검험,P<0.05위차이유통계학의의。결과공납입2월-59월환인22명,중위수년령위28월,소유환인용약전후적은성뇌간반응역치、Ⅰ파、Ⅲ파、Ⅴ파잠복기급Ⅰ-Ⅴ파간기변화균무통계학차이;합병용약조(13례)화비합병용약조(9례),조간은역학변화무통계학차이;의거간신공능결과분정상조(14례)화이상조(8례),조간은역학변화무통계학차이;의거용약시장분소우10천조(12례),대우10천조(10례),조간은역학변화무통계학차이。결론1)만고매소중단기적사용대유인적은력무명현손해;2)합병용약、용약시장、반발적간신공능손해몰유증가은력손해적풍험。
Object To determine whether vancomycin affects hearing in children. Methods Twenty two children diagnosed with acute infection were treated with vancomycin at Beijing Children’s Hospital Infec-tious Disease Department from January 2014 to June 2014. Patients’hearing was tested using auditory brain-stem responses (ABR) before and after vancomycin treatment. Relations between treatment course, co-adminis-tered medications, liver and/or kidney functions and hearing results were analyzed using paired t test or rank-sum test, with P<0.05 representing statistical significance. Results In the 22 patients (aged from 2 months to 59 months with a median age of 28 months), ABR thresholds at 4 kHz, latencies of wave I, III and V and the I-V interpeak latency showed no statistically significant differences before and after vancomycin treat-ment, or when compared between those treated with (n=13) or without (n=9) additional co-administered medi-cations. Nor did hearing show statistically significant differences when compared between patients with (n=8) or without (n=14) co-existing abnormal liver and/or kidney functions. No significant difference in hearing was seen between patients treated for less than 10 days (n=12) and those treated beyond 10 days (n=10). Conclu-sion 1) The use of vancomycin has no damaging effects on hearing in young children over short term. 2) How-ever, potentially increased risks for hearing damage associated with co-administration of medications, pro-longed duration of treatment or abnormal live/kidney functions may need further studies.