农业科学与技术(英文版)
農業科學與技術(英文版)
농업과학여기술(영문판)
Agricultural Science & Technology
2015年
10期
2247-2251,2255
,共6页
党雯%郜春花%张强%李建华%卢朝东%靳东升%卢晋晶
黨雯%郜春花%張彊%李建華%盧朝東%靳東升%盧晉晶
당문%고춘화%장강%리건화%로조동%근동승%로진정
Biolog法%预处理方法%土壤微生物群落%功能多样性%AWCD值
Biolog法%預處理方法%土壤微生物群落%功能多樣性%AWCD值
Biolog법%예처리방법%토양미생물군락%공능다양성%AWCD치
Biolog method%Preprocessing method%Soil microbial community%Func-tional diversity%AWCD values
作为测定微生物群落功能多样性主要方法之一的 biolog法,由于操作简单、灵敏度高、分辨力强、获得数据量丰富,受到众多研究者的青睐,但文献中报道的有关实验预处理方法却不尽相同。为了筛选最佳的预处理方法,通过比较文献中3种较为常用的方法,研究不同预处理对 biolog法测定微生物群落功能多样性的影响。结果表明:AWCD值总体变化趋势B方法优于 A、C;微生物对六类碳源的利用率中 B方法对大部分碳源利用较高,且结果较稳定;两种处理的 Simpson指数、Shannon丰富度指数及碳源利用丰富度指数均B>C>A,而 McIntosh指数、Shannon均匀度结果不太稳定,但经方差分析,其差异不显著,且 B方法的方差最小;主成分分析的结果 B方法优于 A与 C。总之,在250 r/min的转速下震荡30 min,并于28℃条件下培养接种平板的处理(B法)效果较好,其测定结果重现性好,且操作简便快捷,是比较理想的预处理方法。
作為測定微生物群落功能多樣性主要方法之一的 biolog法,由于操作簡單、靈敏度高、分辨力彊、穫得數據量豐富,受到衆多研究者的青睞,但文獻中報道的有關實驗預處理方法卻不儘相同。為瞭篩選最佳的預處理方法,通過比較文獻中3種較為常用的方法,研究不同預處理對 biolog法測定微生物群落功能多樣性的影響。結果錶明:AWCD值總體變化趨勢B方法優于 A、C;微生物對六類碳源的利用率中 B方法對大部分碳源利用較高,且結果較穩定;兩種處理的 Simpson指數、Shannon豐富度指數及碳源利用豐富度指數均B>C>A,而 McIntosh指數、Shannon均勻度結果不太穩定,但經方差分析,其差異不顯著,且 B方法的方差最小;主成分分析的結果 B方法優于 A與 C。總之,在250 r/min的轉速下震盪30 min,併于28℃條件下培養接種平闆的處理(B法)效果較好,其測定結果重現性好,且操作簡便快捷,是比較理想的預處理方法。
작위측정미생물군락공능다양성주요방법지일적 biolog법,유우조작간단、령민도고、분변력강、획득수거량봉부,수도음다연구자적청래,단문헌중보도적유관실험예처리방법각불진상동。위료사선최가적예처리방법,통과비교문헌중3충교위상용적방법,연구불동예처리대 biolog법측정미생물군락공능다양성적영향。결과표명:AWCD치총체변화추세B방법우우 A、C;미생물대륙류탄원적이용솔중 B방법대대부분탄원이용교고,차결과교은정;량충처리적 Simpson지수、Shannon봉부도지수급탄원이용봉부도지수균B>C>A,이 McIntosh지수、Shannon균균도결과불태은정,단경방차분석,기차이불현저,차 B방법적방차최소;주성분분석적결과 B방법우우 A여 C。총지,재250 r/min적전속하진탕30 min,병우28℃조건하배양접충평판적처리(B법)효과교호,기측정결과중현성호,차조작간편쾌첩,시비교이상적예처리방법。
As one of the main methods of microbial community functional diversity measurement, biolog method was favored by many researchers for its simple oper-ation, high sensitivity, strong resolution and rich data. But the preprocessing meth-ods reported in the literatures were not the same. In order to screen the best pre-processing method, this paper took three typical treatments to explore the effect of different preprocessing methods on soil microbial community functional diversity. The results showed that, method B’s overal trend of AWCD values was better than A and C’s. Method B’s microbial utilization of six carbon sources was higher, and the result was relatively stable. The Simpson index, Shannon richness index and Car-bon source utilization richness index of the two treatments were B>C>A, while the McIntosh index and Shannon evenness were not very stable, but the difference of variance analysis was not significant, and the method B was always with a smal est variance. Method B’s principal component analysis was better than A and C’s. In a word, the method using 250 r/min shaking for 30 minutes and cultivating at 28 ℃was the best one, because it was simple, convenient, and with good repeatability.