CAJ | 학술논문

本文立足于科普图书创作出版资助项目实施情况的评估工作，初步构建了科普图书评价的指标体系框架，该指标框架包含了科学性、创作水平、编校出版质量和社会影响4个一级指标，以及知识性、原创性、通俗性、编校差错率、发行总量等13个二级指标。通过对北京地区某科普图书类资助项目近几年资助出版的图书作品进行实证测验应用，发现该指标框架基本适用。同时针对评估结果存在的问题，提出了提高科普图书创作与出版质量的对策建议。
본문립족우과보도서창작출판자조항목실시정황적평고공작，초보구건료과보도서평개적지표체계광가，해지표광가포함료과학성、창작수평、편교출판질량화사회영향4개일급지표，이급지식성、원창성、통속성、편교차착솔、발행총량등13개이급지표。통과대북경지구모과보도서류자조항목근궤년자조출판적도서작품진행실증측험응용，발현해지표광가기본괄용。동시침대평고결과존재적문제，제출료제고과보도서창작여출판질량적대책건의。
The primary purpose of this paper is to build up an evaluation system of the popular science books based on an publication-funded project in Beijing. The methods adopted in this paper include documentation, analysis, statistics and empirical investigation. It is included 4 first-class index in the evaluation system:science, social impact, level of creation and publishing quality,as well as 13 second-class index such as knowledgeable,originality,popularity,error rate of editing&proofreading and total circulation. The evaluation system functions quite well after being applied to the assessment of the popular science books funded by Beijing municipal government in recent years. It also discusses the existing problems and puts forward some advice for its improvement.