CAJ | 학술논문

知识产权司法保护中的禁令制度可分为临时禁令和长期禁令两种，临时禁令能有效遏制对权利人正在逼近的实质性损害，长期禁令能促成潜在被许可人与权利人之间知识产权许可交易的达成，禁令还具有惩罚性赔偿责任功能。司法实践中准确适用两种禁令，不仅能弥补我国知识产权领域惩罚性赔偿责任的缺失，而且还有利于促进知识产权的市场化交易。
지식산권사법보호중적금령제도가분위림시금령화장기금령량충，림시금령능유효알제대권리인정재핍근적실질성손해，장기금령능촉성잠재피허가인여권리인지간지식산권허가교역적체성，금령환구유징벌성배상책임공능。사법실천중준학괄용량충금령，불부능미보아국지식산권영역징벌성배상책임적결실，이차환유리우촉진지식산권적시장화교역。
Injunctions of intellectual property can be divided into preliminary injunctions and permanent Injunc?tions, preliminary injunctions can curb “approaching substantial damage” of intellectual property, permanent in?junctions can contribute to reach intellectual property licensing deals, injunctive function of intellectual property protection system is similar as punitive damages. It makes up for the lack of punitive damages responsibility of our intellectual property legal remedies, we should accurately grasp the two Injunctions applicable standards and scope of judicial practice in the field of intellectual property, it not only can compensate for the lack of punitive damages in intellectual property remedies, but also can effectively promote the intellectual property’s licensing deals.