重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)
重慶文理學院學報(社會科學版)
중경문이학원학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences
2015年
6期
40-46
,共7页
黄帝%谱系%再认识
黃帝%譜繫%再認識
황제%보계%재인식
Emperor Huang%lineage%recognition
流传至今稍具条贯且有一定情节的黄帝故事,大抵出自太史公的《史记·五帝本纪》。对此文,有人推崇备至,认为是太史公有关中国上古史的伟大建构,其所言五帝三王皆源出黄帝一系的上古帝王谱系是靠得住的;亦有学者认为,太史公所言虽有某些历史的真实影像在,但作为一统的古帝王谱系,却是不靠谱的。笔者倾向于后一种意见,认为以《史记·五帝本纪》为代表的古帝王谱系,虽非满篇皆非,一无是处,拆开来看,它的许多构件亦非太史公等的向壁虚造,而是渊源有自,其中保有不同时期、地区古先民们的部分真实史影,但把它们组装为一庞大谱系,则是很靠不住的,今之研究者在使用这个谱系时,务必谨慎对待,认真分析、鉴别、取舍。
流傳至今稍具條貫且有一定情節的黃帝故事,大牴齣自太史公的《史記·五帝本紀》。對此文,有人推崇備至,認為是太史公有關中國上古史的偉大建構,其所言五帝三王皆源齣黃帝一繫的上古帝王譜繫是靠得住的;亦有學者認為,太史公所言雖有某些歷史的真實影像在,但作為一統的古帝王譜繫,卻是不靠譜的。筆者傾嚮于後一種意見,認為以《史記·五帝本紀》為代錶的古帝王譜繫,雖非滿篇皆非,一無是處,拆開來看,它的許多構件亦非太史公等的嚮壁虛造,而是淵源有自,其中保有不同時期、地區古先民們的部分真實史影,但把它們組裝為一龐大譜繫,則是很靠不住的,今之研究者在使用這箇譜繫時,務必謹慎對待,認真分析、鑒彆、取捨。
류전지금초구조관차유일정정절적황제고사,대저출자태사공적《사기·오제본기》。대차문,유인추숭비지,인위시태사공유관중국상고사적위대건구,기소언오제삼왕개원출황제일계적상고제왕보계시고득주적;역유학자인위,태사공소언수유모사역사적진실영상재,단작위일통적고제왕보계,각시불고보적。필자경향우후일충의견,인위이《사기·오제본기》위대표적고제왕보계,수비만편개비,일무시처,탁개래간,타적허다구건역비태사공등적향벽허조,이시연원유자,기중보유불동시기、지구고선민문적부분진실사영,단파타문조장위일방대보계,칙시흔고불주적,금지연구자재사용저개보계시,무필근신대대,인진분석、감별、취사。
The Huang Emperor stories spreading to the present with proper order and plots, most of them originated from the Records of the Historian written by Si Maqian. Some people recommend it a lot, believing that the great construction of the old history made by Si Maqian in which the Three Emperors and Three Kings originate from the Huang Emperor family tree is credi-ble; while other scholars think that Huang Emperor family is the only united emperor system is incredible, although there are some historical images. The author prefers to the later one, believing that the old emperor’s family in the Records of the Historian is nothing and meaningless, in which the Historian, Si Maqian fabricated the components. Although there are partial truth histories in the old times at different regions, it is incredible to create the series of the family tree. The researchers today should be careful to deal with, analyze and select the family tree.