CAJ | 학술논문

在运用熵值赋权法处理综合评价问题的过程中, 当出现极端值时指标值会出现异常的不足, 为此对熵值赋权法进行了修正, 并利用数据的信息度量和信息损失的容忍度, 讨论了修正的范围及修正的影响, 给出了熵值赋权法修正的范围. 利用修正的熵值赋权法和改进的TOPSIS模型, 对比综合垂面距离和无量纲综合值排名对广西14个城市作了城市旅游竞争力综合评价的排名和分析, 结果表明: 无纲综合值排名不够客观, 而熵权综合和垂面距离排名也有区别, 从综合城市旅游竞争力的其他重要指标看, 熵权综合值改进模型得出的结论更符合实际情况.
재운용적치부권법처리종합평개문제적과정중, 당출현겁단치시지표치회출현이상적불족, 위차대적치부권법진행료수정, 병이용수거적신식도량화신식손실적용인도, 토론료수정적범위급수정적영향, 급출료적치부권법수정적범위. 이용수정적적치부권법화개진적TOPSIS모형, 대비종합수면거리화무량강종합치배명대엄서14개성시작료성시여유경쟁력종합평개적배명화분석, 결과표명: 무강종합치배명불구객관, 이적권종합화수면거리배명야유구별, 종종합성시여유경쟁력적기타중요지표간, 적권종합치개진모형득출적결론경부합실제정황.
In the process of dealing with the comprehensive evaluation problems by entropy weighting method, when there is an extreme value, the indicator value will be abnormal.The entropy method was improved and the range of correction and effect were discussed through data information measurement and information loss toler-ance.Through the modified entropy method and improved TOPSIS, compared with vertical projection distance and dimensionless comprehensive value, according to the comprehensive evaluation of urban tourism competi-tiveness, 14 cities in Guangxi have been ranked.The result is analyzed, which shows that the dimensionless comprehensive value is not objective enough.The entropy weight method and vertical distance are also differ-ent.Combined with other indicators, the conclusion of improved model is more applicable.