CAJ | 학술논문

采用Rabl和Kuhlmann的腐败行为模型，通过探索性访谈，头脑风暴研讨会和问卷调查三种方式采集数据，分析微观意义上我国房地产领域腐败的发生机理。研究发现，欲望、主观准则、行为控制感知、态度四个因素明显与房地产领域腐败行动正相关。但意图和目标可行性两个因素却不相关。比较而言，欲望是房地产领域腐败行动的主导因素。由于受到控制因素，例如动机、法律、规章和个人价值观的作用，一定程度上腐败意图可减少。进一步揭示，房地产领域复杂的契约结构引致利益相关者不同的心理活动，使其态度倾向于选择腐败行动，而且腐败可以存在于房地产领域的每一个阶段。腐败行动实质上是一种浓缩的个人抉择过程，涉及不同类型的犯罪，表明一些非法的人类行为难以识别和测量。因此，房地产领域腐败问题的治理除了考虑技术层面（不充分的立法和惩处），还要着重考虑制度当中腐败的行为因素，特别是将政府决策的扭曲和不透明、反腐制度的脆弱、送礼与贿赂不分文化的持久泛滥、质量不佳的公共服务、交易公开的不充分纳入治理之列。
채용Rabl화Kuhlmann적부패행위모형，통과탐색성방담，두뇌풍폭연토회화문권조사삼충방식채집수거，분석미관의의상아국방지산영역부패적발생궤리。연구발현，욕망、주관준칙、행위공제감지、태도사개인소명현여방지산영역부패행동정상관。단의도화목표가행성량개인소각불상관。비교이언，욕망시방지산영역부패행동적주도인소。유우수도공제인소，례여동궤、법률、규장화개인개치관적작용，일정정도상부패의도가감소。진일보게시，방지산영역복잡적계약결구인치이익상관자불동적심리활동，사기태도경향우선택부패행동，이차부패가이존재우방지산영역적매일개계단。부패행동실질상시일충농축적개인결택과정，섭급불동류형적범죄，표명일사비법적인류행위난이식별화측량。인차，방지산영역부패문제적치리제료고필기술층면（불충분적입법화징처），환요착중고필제도당중부패적행위인소，특별시장정부결책적뉴곡화불투명、반부제도적취약、송례여회뢰불분문화적지구범람、질량불가적공공복무、교역공개적불충분납입치리지렬。
This paper aims to analyze the operating mechanism of the corruption in real estate by the data collected from exploratory interviews, brain storming workshop and questionnaire survey. The model of corruption action of Rabl&Kuhlmann is employed. We find that four factors and corruption behavior are obviously positive correlation, they are desire, subjective norm, perceived behavior control, and attitude, but intention and goal feasibility are not related to corruption behavior. Comparatively speaking, desire is the leading factor among them. To some extent, intention of corruption can be decreased due to the control factors such as motivation, law, rules and individual values. The paper further explores that the complicated contract structures cause psychological changes of the stakeholders, whose attitudes will tend to make corruption behavior choice. Moreover, corruption behaviours exist in every stage of real estate. In nature, corruption behavior can be regarded as condensed process of individual decision involving different types of crimes, it shows that some illicit human behaviors are difficult to to recognize or measure. Hence, despite corruption should be treated as a technical matter of insufficient legislation and punishment, behavioural issues of individuals in the institutions should not be left behind, which means we should concern environmental factors including distorted or opaque government decisions, weak counter-corruption institutions, cultures intertwined gift-giving with bribery, poor quality of public service and inadequate openness in trade.