CAJ | 학술논문

由唐至宋，伴随着弥封誊录制度的形成和固定化，书法素质高低对科举考试成败的影响大为降低，但唐人尚法向宋人尚意的整体书法时代特征并非是宋代科举弥封誊录制度推行和应用的结果。宋人对“意”的追求是以“法”为基础的，“意”与“法”之间没有自由创作与困于樊笼的理念对立，更没有行草书与楷书之间的字体对立，而是包含了在现有的经验上寻求新的拓展空间的发展关系。至于唐宋两代书法家不同的艺术追求和书法作品所表现出的时代气质，可能是文人社会地位及精神状态的不同造成的。
유당지송，반수착미봉등록제도적형성화고정화，서법소질고저대과거고시성패적영향대위강저，단당인상법향송인상의적정체서법시대특정병비시송대과거미봉등록제도추행화응용적결과。송인대“의”적추구시이“법”위기출적，“의”여“법”지간몰유자유창작여곤우번롱적이념대립，경몰유행초서여해서지간적자체대립，이시포함료재현유적경험상심구신적탁전공간적발전관계。지우당송량대서법가불동적예술추구화서법작품소표현출적시대기질，가능시문인사회지위급정신상태적불동조성적。
With the establishment of the sealing and transcribing system, the influence of the quality of calligraphy on the success in the imperial examinations in the Song Dynasty was greatly reduced in com-parison with the Tang Dynasty. However, the calligraphy characteristics of esteeming norm in the Tang Dynasty and valuing meaning in the Song Dynasty were not the result of the implementation and applica-tion of the sealing and transcribing system in the imperial examinations in the Song Dynasty. The pursuit of “meaning” in the Song Dynasty was actually based on“norm”. What exists between“meaning” and“norm” is not an ideological opposition between free creation and restricted creation, or a calligraphic opposition between running and cursive scripts and regular script, but a developmental relationship of expanding new space on the basis of existing experience. The different artistic pursuits of the calligra-phers in the Tang and Song dynasties and the different zeitgeists embodied in the calligraphic works most probably resulted from the different social positions and spiritual states of the literati.