CAJ | 학술논문

休谟否认自然齐一性的存在,并对归纳推理的有效性提出了质疑,这使得科学知识的合法性遭到挑战.为了解决归纳问题,哲学家们进行了不懈的探索,金岳霖就是其中一个.在金岳霖看来,归纳推理是从特殊到普遍的抽象过程,而归纳原则就是"如果—则(大概)"式的命题.他从部分真则全体可能为真、时间不会打住以及秩序之有三个方面论证了归纳原则永真.通过分析可以发现,归纳原则永真不是金岳霖论证所得的结论,而是其知识论必须接受的前提假设.因此,金岳霖并没有真正解决归纳问题.
휴모부인자연제일성적존재,병대귀납추리적유효성제출료질의,저사득과학지식적합법성조도도전.위료해결귀납문제,철학가문진행료불해적탐색,금악림취시기중일개.재금악림간래,귀납추리시종특수도보편적추상과정,이귀납원칙취시"여과—칙(대개)"식적명제.타종부분진칙전체가능위진、시간불회타주이급질서지유삼개방면론증료귀납원칙영진.통과분석가이발현,귀납원칙영진불시금악림론증소득적결론,이시기지식론필수접수적전제가설.인차,금악림병몰유진정해결귀납문제.
Hume denied the principle of uniformity of nature and queried the validity of inductive reasoning, thus bring challenge to the necessity of scientific knowledge. In order to answer the problem, many philosophers undertook unremitting exploration. Being one of them, Jin Yuelin argued that the inductive reasoning is an abstract process from the specific to the general and the principle of induction is expressed by the hypothesis of "if-then (possibly)". He attempted to demonstrate the validity of principle of induction from three aspects, such as, the hypothesis that if a part is true then all is probably true, the eternity of time, and the existence of orders. Based on the analysis, it is found that the validity of principle of induction is not what Jin Yuelin came up with, but the premise that he should take for granted in his epistemology. So Jin Yuelin didn't answer the Hume's problem of induction actually.