CAJ | 학술논문

王安石《上仁宗皇帝书》与龚自珍《对策》,都以"法古而不泥古"为改革思路,重视人才选拔、培养和任用的正确方法.但由于两人所面临的重大社会问题不同,他们强调的改革重点也就不完全一样.王安石注重理财,龚自珍则侧重"务本"、"河漕"和"西塞"等问题的论述.王安石和龚自珍敢于担当的民族忧患意识和勇于破旧立新的改革智慧都是中华民族精神财富的重要组成部分,对于当前我国全面深化改革具有重要启示和借鉴.
왕안석《상인종황제서》여공자진《대책》,도이"법고이불니고"위개혁사로,중시인재선발、배양화임용적정학방법.단유우량인소면림적중대사회문제불동,타문강조적개혁중점야취불완전일양.왕안석주중리재,공자진칙측중"무본"、"하조"화"서새"등문제적논술.왕안석화공자진감우담당적민족우환의식화용우파구립신적개혁지혜도시중화민족정신재부적중요조성부분,대우당전아국전면심화개혁구유중요계시화차감.
Both Wang Anshi's The Statement Submitted Emperor Renzong and Gong Zizhen'sThe Answers to Politicsadopt the reform thinking of following the examples of ancients instead of rigidly adhering to them, and stress on the proper selection, training and appointment of talents. Given the different social issues they were faced with,, their reform emphasis varied greatly. Wang An-shih paid attention to the importance of finance, while Gong Zi-zhen attached importance to the agriculture, the water course management, and the western border governance. Both of them took on the responsibility of the nationality sense of hardship and the reform thinking to demolish and establish courageously, which is important component of the treasures of Chinese national spirit and provides reference to deepen Chinese reform in an all-round way.