广西医学
廣西醫學
엄서의학
Guangxi Medical Journal
2015年
9期
1265-1267
,共3页
周德玫%梁柱石%莫穆隆%周甦%程璐宁%钟大明%黄献球
週德玫%樑柱石%莫穆隆%週甦%程璐寧%鐘大明%黃獻毬
주덕매%량주석%막목륭%주소%정로저%종대명%황헌구
肝功能衰竭%简易模型%预后%血小板%总胆红素%凝血酶原时间国际标准化比率
肝功能衰竭%簡易模型%預後%血小闆%總膽紅素%凝血酶原時間國際標準化比率
간공능쇠갈%간역모형%예후%혈소판%총담홍소%응혈매원시간국제표준화비솔
Liver failure%Simple model%Prognosis%Platelet%Total bilirubin%International normalized ratio
目的:探讨PBI简易模型预测慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者预后的临床价值。方法将213例ACLF患者按治疗后临床转归分为好转存活组103例及恶化死亡组110例,于患者入院时至出院前应用PBI简易模型和终末期肝病模型(MELD)对两组患者进行评估,比较两种评估方法评分差异及变化曲线,应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析 PBI与MELD对ACLF预后的预测效能。结果入院时,好转存活组 PBI 评分为(14.99±11.28)分,明显高于与恶化死亡组的(7.98±7.45)分(P<0.01),MELD评分为(25.69±5.69)分,明显低于恶化死亡组的(31.13±7.42)分(P<0.01)。存活组入院时的PBI评分明显低于出院前(P <0.05),死亡组入院时 PBI评分高于出院前(P<0.05),好转存活组入院时的MELD评分高于出院前(P<0.05),恶化死亡组入院时的MELD评分低于出院前(P<0.05)。两组患者的统计曲线变化趋势均呈完全反向状态。在住院初期,PBI模型及MELD模型的曲线下面积分别为0.75、0.71。结论 PBI简易模型评分评估ACLF患者预后具有较好的临床价值。
目的:探討PBI簡易模型預測慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者預後的臨床價值。方法將213例ACLF患者按治療後臨床轉歸分為好轉存活組103例及噁化死亡組110例,于患者入院時至齣院前應用PBI簡易模型和終末期肝病模型(MELD)對兩組患者進行評估,比較兩種評估方法評分差異及變化麯線,應用受試者工作特徵(ROC)麯線分析 PBI與MELD對ACLF預後的預測效能。結果入院時,好轉存活組 PBI 評分為(14.99±11.28)分,明顯高于與噁化死亡組的(7.98±7.45)分(P<0.01),MELD評分為(25.69±5.69)分,明顯低于噁化死亡組的(31.13±7.42)分(P<0.01)。存活組入院時的PBI評分明顯低于齣院前(P <0.05),死亡組入院時 PBI評分高于齣院前(P<0.05),好轉存活組入院時的MELD評分高于齣院前(P<0.05),噁化死亡組入院時的MELD評分低于齣院前(P<0.05)。兩組患者的統計麯線變化趨勢均呈完全反嚮狀態。在住院初期,PBI模型及MELD模型的麯線下麵積分彆為0.75、0.71。結論 PBI簡易模型評分評估ACLF患者預後具有較好的臨床價值。
목적:탐토PBI간역모형예측만가급성간쇠갈(ACLF)환자예후적림상개치。방법장213례ACLF환자안치료후림상전귀분위호전존활조103례급악화사망조110례,우환자입원시지출원전응용PBI간역모형화종말기간병모형(MELD)대량조환자진행평고,비교량충평고방법평분차이급변화곡선,응용수시자공작특정(ROC)곡선분석 PBI여MELD대ACLF예후적예측효능。결과입원시,호전존활조 PBI 평분위(14.99±11.28)분,명현고우여악화사망조적(7.98±7.45)분(P<0.01),MELD평분위(25.69±5.69)분,명현저우악화사망조적(31.13±7.42)분(P<0.01)。존활조입원시적PBI평분명현저우출원전(P <0.05),사망조입원시 PBI평분고우출원전(P<0.05),호전존활조입원시적MELD평분고우출원전(P<0.05),악화사망조입원시적MELD평분저우출원전(P<0.05)。량조환자적통계곡선변화추세균정완전반향상태。재주원초기,PBI모형급MELD모형적곡선하면적분별위0.75、0.71。결론 PBI간역모형평분평고ACLF환자예후구유교호적림상개치。
Objective To explore the clinical value of PBI simple model for prognostic prediction in patients with acute -on-chronic liver failure(ACLF).Methods Two hundred and thirteen patients with ACLF were divided into improvement /survival group(n=103) and deterioration/death group(n=110) according to the prognosis after treatment .The assessments on the patients in two groups were performed with PBI model and model for end-stage liver disease ( MELD) from admission to discharge .And the scores and variation curves of the two models were compared between two groups .The efficacies of prognostic prediction of the two models for ACLF was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve.Results At the admission,the PBI score in the improvement/survival group was significantly higher than that in the deterioration/death group((14.99 ±11.28) vs.(7.98 ±7.45),P<0.01)),and the MELD score in the improvement/survival group was significantly lower than that in the deterioration/death group((25.69 ±5.69) vs.(31.13 ±7.42),P<0.01)).The PBI score at the admission was significantly lower in the improvement/survival group but was higher in the deterioration/death group compared to the score at the instant before discharge (P<0.05).The MELD score at the admission was higher in the improvement /survival group but was lower in the deterioration/death group compared to the score at the instant before discharge (P<0.05).The absolute opposition-based trend was observed in the changes of statistical curve in two groups .In the early days of hospitalization ,the areas under ROC curve of PBI model and MELD were 0.75 and 0.71,respectively.Conclusion PBI simple model score has a better clinical value in evaluating the prognosis of patients with ACLF.