地球学报
地毬學報
지구학보
Acta Geoscientia Sinica
2015年
6期
780-788
,共9页
师江朋%霍腾飞%来强%彭祥华%杜孙岩%杨德彬
師江朋%霍騰飛%來彊%彭祥華%杜孫巖%楊德彬
사강붕%곽등비%래강%팽상화%두손암%양덕빈
早志留世%花岗岩%锆石U-Pb年代学%地球化学%刚察大寺%南祁连
早誌留世%花崗巖%鋯石U-Pb年代學%地毬化學%剛察大寺%南祁連
조지류세%화강암%고석U-Pb년대학%지구화학%강찰대사%남기련
Early Silurian%granite%zircon U-Pb dating%geochemistry%Gangchadasi%South Qilian block
南祁连北缘东段刚察大寺花岗岩的形成时代和成因一直存在争议。本文对其进行了锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学研究,进而约束其岩石成因和形成的构造背景。结果表明,刚察大寺花岗岩主要由花岗闪长岩和黑云母二长花岗岩组成;花岗闪长岩中锆石自形程度较好,阴极发光图像显示振荡生长环带,具有较高的Th/U比值(0.27~0.91),表明其为岩浆成因;最小一组岩浆锆石的206Pb/238U加权平均年龄为(435±4) Ma,即岩体形成于早志留世;花岗闪长岩和黑云母二长花岗岩具有类似的地球化学属性,主量元素具有高硅、富碱、富铝和贫镁的特征,其SiO2=65.52%~74.23%、(K2O+Na2O)=6.95%~8.24%、Al2O3=12.33%~15.26%、MgO=0.31%~1.32%, A/CNK介于0.85~1.05之间,为准铝质-弱过铝质的亚碱性系列岩石;整体富集轻稀土元素和大离子亲石元素(Rb、Ba、K)、亏损重稀土元素和高场强元素(Nb、Ta),具有Eu的负异常(δEu=0.51~0.80)和Sr、P、Ti的明显亏损。南祁连北缘东段刚察大寺花岗岩为I型花岗岩,起源于高温低压条件下中、上地壳物质的部分熔融,结合区域构造演化暗示,刚察大寺早志留世花岗岩形成于活动大陆边缘的构造背景。
南祁連北緣東段剛察大寺花崗巖的形成時代和成因一直存在爭議。本文對其進行瞭鋯石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代學和巖石地毬化學研究,進而約束其巖石成因和形成的構造揹景。結果錶明,剛察大寺花崗巖主要由花崗閃長巖和黑雲母二長花崗巖組成;花崗閃長巖中鋯石自形程度較好,陰極髮光圖像顯示振盪生長環帶,具有較高的Th/U比值(0.27~0.91),錶明其為巖漿成因;最小一組巖漿鋯石的206Pb/238U加權平均年齡為(435±4) Ma,即巖體形成于早誌留世;花崗閃長巖和黑雲母二長花崗巖具有類似的地毬化學屬性,主量元素具有高硅、富堿、富鋁和貧鎂的特徵,其SiO2=65.52%~74.23%、(K2O+Na2O)=6.95%~8.24%、Al2O3=12.33%~15.26%、MgO=0.31%~1.32%, A/CNK介于0.85~1.05之間,為準鋁質-弱過鋁質的亞堿性繫列巖石;整體富集輕稀土元素和大離子親石元素(Rb、Ba、K)、虧損重稀土元素和高場彊元素(Nb、Ta),具有Eu的負異常(δEu=0.51~0.80)和Sr、P、Ti的明顯虧損。南祁連北緣東段剛察大寺花崗巖為I型花崗巖,起源于高溫低壓條件下中、上地殼物質的部分鎔融,結閤區域構造縯化暗示,剛察大寺早誌留世花崗巖形成于活動大陸邊緣的構造揹景。
남기련북연동단강찰대사화강암적형성시대화성인일직존재쟁의。본문대기진행료고석LA-ICP-MS U-Pb년대학화암석지구화학연구,진이약속기암석성인화형성적구조배경。결과표명,강찰대사화강암주요유화강섬장암화흑운모이장화강암조성;화강섬장암중고석자형정도교호,음겁발광도상현시진탕생장배대,구유교고적Th/U비치(0.27~0.91),표명기위암장성인;최소일조암장고석적206Pb/238U가권평균년령위(435±4) Ma,즉암체형성우조지류세;화강섬장암화흑운모이장화강암구유유사적지구화학속성,주량원소구유고규、부감、부려화빈미적특정,기SiO2=65.52%~74.23%、(K2O+Na2O)=6.95%~8.24%、Al2O3=12.33%~15.26%、MgO=0.31%~1.32%, A/CNK개우0.85~1.05지간,위준려질-약과려질적아감성계렬암석;정체부집경희토원소화대리자친석원소(Rb、Ba、K)、우손중희토원소화고장강원소(Nb、Ta),구유Eu적부이상(δEu=0.51~0.80)화Sr、P、Ti적명현우손。남기련북연동단강찰대사화강암위I형화강암,기원우고온저압조건하중、상지각물질적부분용융,결합구역구조연화암시,강찰대사조지류세화강암형성우활동대륙변연적구조배경。
The formation age and petrogenesis of the Gangchadasi granites in the eastern segment of the northern South Qilian block remain controversial. New LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating and whole-rock geochemical analysis were conducted in this study to constrain the petrogenetic and tectonic processes during the formation of the granites. The Gangchadasi granites are mainly composed of granodiorite and biotite-monzogranite. Zircons from the granodiorite show euhedral shape, oscillatory CL zoning and high Th/U ratios (0.27 ~ 0.91), indicative of a magmatic origin. The weighted mean of the youngest group of concordant206Pb/238U ages yielded an emplacement age of (435±4) Ma. The granodiorite and biotite-monzogranite share similar geochemical characteristics, such as high content of SiO2 (65.52% ~ 74.23%), total alkali ((Na2O+K2O)=6.95% ~ 8.24%), and aluminum (Al2O3=12.33% ~ 15.26%), and low amounts of magnesium (MgO=0.31% ~ 1.32%). Their A/CNK ratios range from 0.85 to 1.05, indicating a transitional composition between metaluminous and peraluminous. The granites are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (e.g., Rb, Ba, and K) and light rare earth elements and depleted in high field strength elements (e.g., Nb and Ta) and heavy rare earth elements, and exhibit prominent negative Eu anomaly (δEu=0.51 ~ 0.80) and depletion of Sr, P, and Ti. It is held that the Gangchadasi granites are I-type granites derived from partial melting of a middle-upper continental crust under the condition of high temperatures and low pressures. In combination with regional tectonic evolution, the authors suggest that the Gangchadasi granites probably formed in an active continental margin during Early Silurian.