中国伤残医学
中國傷殘醫學
중국상잔의학
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
2015年
23期
15-16
,共2页
右美托咪啶%机械通气%镇静%咪达唑仑
右美託咪啶%機械通氣%鎮靜%咪達唑崙
우미탁미정%궤계통기%진정%미체서륜
Dexmedetomidine%Mechanically ventilating%Sedation%Midazolam
目的：研究右美托咪啶对机械通气患者的镇静作用。方法：将2014年2月～2014年10月我院ICU收治需要镇静42例机械通气患者随机分为右美托咪啶组（观察组）、咪达唑仑组（对照组），比较2组患者镇静情况，血压变化。2组患者年龄、性别及疾病情况差别无统计学意义。结果：观察组镇静过程中可以达到镇静满意程度效果明显优于对照组，同时镇静过程中观察组出现血压下降患者2例，对照组出现8例，差别有明显统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论：右美托咪啶可首选为ICU机械通气患者的镇静药。
目的：研究右美託咪啶對機械通氣患者的鎮靜作用。方法：將2014年2月～2014年10月我院ICU收治需要鎮靜42例機械通氣患者隨機分為右美託咪啶組（觀察組）、咪達唑崙組（對照組），比較2組患者鎮靜情況，血壓變化。2組患者年齡、性彆及疾病情況差彆無統計學意義。結果：觀察組鎮靜過程中可以達到鎮靜滿意程度效果明顯優于對照組，同時鎮靜過程中觀察組齣現血壓下降患者2例，對照組齣現8例，差彆有明顯統計學意義（P＜0．05）。結論：右美託咪啶可首選為ICU機械通氣患者的鎮靜藥。
목적：연구우미탁미정대궤계통기환자적진정작용。방법：장2014년2월～2014년10월아원ICU수치수요진정42례궤계통기환자수궤분위우미탁미정조（관찰조）、미체서륜조（대조조），비교2조환자진정정황，혈압변화。2조환자년령、성별급질병정황차별무통계학의의。결과：관찰조진정과정중가이체도진정만의정도효과명현우우대조조，동시진정과정중관찰조출현혈압하강환자2례，대조조출현8례，차별유명현통계학의의（P＜0．05）。결론：우미탁미정가수선위ICU궤계통기환자적진정약。
Objective:To investigate the sedation cure of dexmedetomidine in patients with mechanically ventilating.Methods: the fouty-two patiients with mechanically ventilating in need of sedation were divided into dexmedetomidine group(observation group),and midazolam group(objective group),and the patients were choosed from the intensive care unit from February 2014 to October 2014,to ob-serve the sedation of the two groups and the change of blood pressure.There was no significant difference in age ,gender propotion and dis-ease.Results:The sedative effect in observation group were much better than objective group, and there only two patients'blood pressure had been decline in dexmedetomidine group,but in midazolam group appeared eight patients.There was significant difference in dexme-detomidine group ang midazolam group,has anterograde annesia(P<0.05).Conlusion:Dexmedetomidine is the first choise in sedation in insentive cure unit at present time.
