中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
China Health Standard Management
2015年
28期
59-60
,共2页
胫腓骨骨折%带锁髓内钉%加压钢板内固定%愈合
脛腓骨骨摺%帶鎖髓內釘%加壓鋼闆內固定%愈閤
경비골골절%대쇄수내정%가압강판내고정%유합
Fractures of the tibia and fibula%Interlocking intramedulary nail%Internal fixation with compression plate%Healing
目的：比较带锁髓内钉与加压钢板内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法选择我院收治的58例胫腓骨骨折患者分别行带锁髓内钉与加压钢板内固定治疗。结果观察组患者出现骨痂时间、负重时间及愈合时间均小于对照组，且观察组并发症发生率13.79%低于对照组并发症发生率27.59%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论带锁髓内钉治疗胫腓骨骨折疗效好，安全有效且并发症少。
目的：比較帶鎖髓內釘與加壓鋼闆內固定治療脛腓骨骨摺的臨床療效及安全性。方法選擇我院收治的58例脛腓骨骨摺患者分彆行帶鎖髓內釘與加壓鋼闆內固定治療。結果觀察組患者齣現骨痂時間、負重時間及愈閤時間均小于對照組，且觀察組併髮癥髮生率13.79%低于對照組併髮癥髮生率27.59%，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論帶鎖髓內釘治療脛腓骨骨摺療效好，安全有效且併髮癥少。
목적：비교대쇄수내정여가압강판내고정치료경비골골절적림상료효급안전성。방법선택아원수치적58례경비골골절환자분별행대쇄수내정여가압강판내고정치료。결과관찰조환자출현골가시간、부중시간급유합시간균소우대조조，차관찰조병발증발생솔13.79%저우대조조병발증발생솔27.59%，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론대쇄수내정치료경비골골절료효호，안전유효차병발증소。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of interlocking intramedulary nailing and compression plate internal fixation.Methods Chose 58 cases of tibia and fibula fractures for treatment with interlocking intramedulary nailing and compression plate internal fixation in our hospital.Results The incidence of bone calus,time and healing time of observation group were significantly lower than that of control group,and the incidence of complications was significantly lower than that in control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of tibial and fibula fractures with interlocking intramedulary nailing are safe and effective.
