教育与经济
教育與經濟
교육여경제
Education and Economy
2015年
5期
46-54
,共9页
高等学校%绩效评价%绩效问责%产出滞后效应
高等學校%績效評價%績效問責%產齣滯後效應
고등학교%적효평개%적효문책%산출체후효응
Higher education institution%Performance evaluation%Performance accountability%Output lag effect
本文采用部属高校2002-2010年基本统计数据，基于教育产出的滞后效应和高校类型多样化因素对部属高校的办学质量和资源利用效率进行了评价，结果发现：（1）除少数高校在个别年份出现综合产出指数的异常波动以外，其余绝大多数高校都呈现出逐年稳步递增的趋势，这表明各高校积极改善办学条件、加强师资队伍建设和深化教学改革等举措有力地促进了学校教学、科研等水平的提高；（2）尽管分别有17%和23%的高校出现绩效指数持续上升和先下降后上升的 U 型变化趋势，但仍有38%和22%的高校分别出现绩效指数起伏不定和下滑的现象，这表明高校需要深入挖掘潜力，采取措施来提高人力、物力和财力资源的利用效果，政府部门也可以考虑将一部分教育经费实行绩效拨款，从而激发高校自觉提高经费使用效率的积极性。
本文採用部屬高校2002-2010年基本統計數據，基于教育產齣的滯後效應和高校類型多樣化因素對部屬高校的辦學質量和資源利用效率進行瞭評價，結果髮現：（1）除少數高校在箇彆年份齣現綜閤產齣指數的異常波動以外，其餘絕大多數高校都呈現齣逐年穩步遞增的趨勢，這錶明各高校積極改善辦學條件、加彊師資隊伍建設和深化教學改革等舉措有力地促進瞭學校教學、科研等水平的提高；（2）儘管分彆有17%和23%的高校齣現績效指數持續上升和先下降後上升的 U 型變化趨勢，但仍有38%和22%的高校分彆齣現績效指數起伏不定和下滑的現象，這錶明高校需要深入挖掘潛力，採取措施來提高人力、物力和財力資源的利用效果，政府部門也可以攷慮將一部分教育經費實行績效撥款，從而激髮高校自覺提高經費使用效率的積極性。
본문채용부속고교2002-2010년기본통계수거，기우교육산출적체후효응화고교류형다양화인소대부속고교적판학질량화자원이용효솔진행료평개，결과발현：（1）제소수고교재개별년빈출현종합산출지수적이상파동이외，기여절대다수고교도정현출축년은보체증적추세，저표명각고교적겁개선판학조건、가강사자대오건설화심화교학개혁등거조유력지촉진료학교교학、과연등수평적제고；（2）진관분별유17%화23%적고교출현적효지수지속상승화선하강후상승적 U 형변화추세，단잉유38%화22%적고교분별출현적효지수기복불정화하활적현상，저표명고교수요심입알굴잠력，채취조시래제고인력、물력화재력자원적이용효과，정부부문야가이고필장일부분교육경비실행적효발관，종이격발고교자각제고경비사용효솔적적겁성。
According to the basic statistical data from 2002 to 2010 collected from the universities administrated by the Ministry of Education, this paper evaluates the educational quality and resource utilization efficiency of these universities based on the output lag effect and diversification of university types. Findings are that (1) Except for the abnormal fluctuations of comprehensive output index in a particular year for a small number of universities, most universities trends to steadily increase year by year. It also indicates that most universities have improved their level of teaching and research by taking such measures as improving educational condition, strengthening the construction of the faculty team and deepening the educational reform. Despite the performance indexes of some universities continuously increase accounting for 17%or present a U shape trend which decrease first ,then increase sharply accounting for 23%, there are also performance indexes with ups and downs trend or continuously declining, accounting respectively for 38%and 22% . The trends show that the universities need to further explore their potential and take measures to effectively utilize human resources, material resources and financial resources.For the government, it should consider to implement the funding policy based on performance evaluation to kindle the enthusiasm of universities for improving efficiency of related expenditure by intention.
