CAJ | 학술논문

非政府组织的问责路径，可以从具体行动策略和制度环境两方面进行构建。行动策略研究的是非政府组织问责的具体方式或手段；制度环境研究的是探讨问责实现所依托的政治民主制度。行动策略的研究论点或命题还处于一种假设中，许多命题还需要通过制度分析等方法进行科学论证，更需要未来实践的检验。民主制度的研究，是通过中西方的比较，发现各自的问责路径所植根的民主制度的区别，西方问责路径实现的民主制度基础不能解释和解决中国的实践问题，中国所要走的是一条“特殊主义”的问责路径。这个问责路径不是以选举制度为基础，而是以政策过程理论为主要逻辑基础的，也体现了非政府组织依附式自主关系下如何问责的特征。
비정부조직적문책로경，가이종구체행동책략화제도배경량방면진행구건。행동책략연구적시비정부조직문책적구체방식혹수단；제도배경연구적시탐토문책실현소의탁적정치민주제도。행동책략적연구론점혹명제환처우일충가설중，허다명제환수요통과제도분석등방법진행과학론증，경수요미래실천적검험。민주제도적연구，시통과중서방적비교，발현각자적문책로경소식근적민주제도적구별，서방문책로경실현적민주제도기출불능해석화해결중국적실천문제，중국소요주적시일조“특수주의”적문책로경。저개문책로경불시이선거제도위기출，이시이정책과정이론위주요라집기출적，야체현료비정부조직의부식자주관계하여하문책적특정。
Accountability path of NGO can be constructed by concrete Action Strategy and Institutional Environment.A-mong them,Action Strategy investigates the concrete means of NGO accountability,and Institutional Environ-ment explores the political democracy system that supports accountability implementation.The investigative the-ses or propositions of Action Strategy are at a hypothetical stage now.Therefore,most of propositions should not only be demonstrated by scientific ways such as system analyzing,but practical test in the future as well. Through the comparative analysis between China and Western countries,the democracy system investigation dis-covers the differences of democracy systems that the accountability path rooted in.The foundation of democracy system achieved by accountability path in Western countries is not an explanation or means for China's practical issue,since the accountability path in China should be Particularism.This form of accountability path is not based on elective system.It is logically based in the theory of policy process;furthermore,it reflects the feature of how NGOs carry out accountability with the independent relationship in dependency mode.