糖尿病新世界
糖尿病新世界
당뇨병신세계
Diabetes New World
2015年
20期
139-141
,共3页
糖尿病足%持续质量改进%护理%效果评价
糖尿病足%持續質量改進%護理%效果評價
당뇨병족%지속질량개진%호리%효과평개
Diabetic foot%Continuous quality improvement%Nursing%Evaluation
目的:对持续护理质量改进用于糖尿病足护理中的效果进行评价。方法选取2014年6月—2015年5月该院收治的50例糖尿病足患者,将这些患者随机分为观察组以及对照组,各组25例患者,观察组运用持续护理质量改进措施,对照组运用常规方法,对两组患者在临床效果进行对比分析。结果通过研究发现,观察组有效率达到了92%,而对照组总有效率达到了80%,两者总有效率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者未进行护理之前,几乎没有任何的差异,但是干预护理之后,两组患者情况都有明显的好转(P<0.05),观察组应用持续护理质量改进之后,观察组各方面都明显的好于对照组(P<0.05)。结论糖尿病足患者应用持续护理质量改进措施之后,效果非常明显,不仅提高了护理人员的积极性,患者的住院时间也有所下降,因此持续护理质量改进措施值得进一步推广与应用。
目的:對持續護理質量改進用于糖尿病足護理中的效果進行評價。方法選取2014年6月—2015年5月該院收治的50例糖尿病足患者,將這些患者隨機分為觀察組以及對照組,各組25例患者,觀察組運用持續護理質量改進措施,對照組運用常規方法,對兩組患者在臨床效果進行對比分析。結果通過研究髮現,觀察組有效率達到瞭92%,而對照組總有效率達到瞭80%,兩者總有效率差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),兩組患者未進行護理之前,幾乎沒有任何的差異,但是榦預護理之後,兩組患者情況都有明顯的好轉(P<0.05),觀察組應用持續護理質量改進之後,觀察組各方麵都明顯的好于對照組(P<0.05)。結論糖尿病足患者應用持續護理質量改進措施之後,效果非常明顯,不僅提高瞭護理人員的積極性,患者的住院時間也有所下降,因此持續護理質量改進措施值得進一步推廣與應用。
목적:대지속호리질량개진용우당뇨병족호리중적효과진행평개。방법선취2014년6월—2015년5월해원수치적50례당뇨병족환자,장저사환자수궤분위관찰조이급대조조,각조25례환자,관찰조운용지속호리질량개진조시,대조조운용상규방법,대량조환자재림상효과진행대비분석。결과통과연구발현,관찰조유효솔체도료92%,이대조조총유효솔체도료80%,량자총유효솔차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),량조환자미진행호리지전,궤호몰유임하적차이,단시간예호리지후,량조환자정황도유명현적호전(P<0.05),관찰조응용지속호리질량개진지후,관찰조각방면도명현적호우대조조(P<0.05)。결론당뇨병족환자응용지속호리질량개진조시지후,효과비상명현,불부제고료호리인원적적겁성,환자적주원시간야유소하강,인차지속호리질량개진조시치득진일보추엄여응용。
Objective To continue:to improve the quality of care for diabetic foot care effect was evaluated. Methods June 2014 to June 2015 for one year between 50 patients with diabetic foot, these patients were randomly divided into two groups and the control group, 25 patients in each group, the observation group using the continuum of care quality im-provement measures in the control group using the conventional method, the final two groups of patients in the clinical ef-fects of this analysis. Results The study found that the efficiency of the observation group have reached 92%, while the to-tal efficiency of the control group was 80%, both the total efficiency has obvious statistical significance (P<0.05), two groups of patients before treatment is not carried out, after almost no difference, but after the intervention of care, both groups had a significant improvement in the situation (P<0.05), observation group continued to improve the quality of care, all aspects of the observation group were significantly better than the control group (P<0.05 ). Conclusion After the diabetic foot pa-tients continuity of care quality improvement measures, the effect is very obvious, not only improve the nurses' enthusiasm, the patient's hospital stay has declined, so the continuity of care quality improvement measures worthy of further promotion and application.