中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)
中華婦幼臨床醫學雜誌(電子版)
중화부유림상의학잡지(전자판)
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics (Electronic Edition)
2015年
5期
574-578
,共5页
沈洁%张月%高丽丽%韩历丽
瀋潔%張月%高麗麗%韓歷麗
침길%장월%고려려%한력려
宫颈肿瘤%普查%阴道涂片%质量控制
宮頸腫瘤%普查%陰道塗片%質量控製
궁경종류%보사%음도도편%질량공제
Uterine cervical neoplasms%Mass screening%Vaginal smears%Quality control
目的:探讨2013年北京市宫颈癌免费筛查获得的宫颈细胞学阅片的质量控制情况,并进行相关分析。方法自2013年在北京市16个区、县宫颈癌筛查机构接受宫颈癌免费筛查获取的286781张宫颈涂片信息中,采用概率随机抽样法,随机抽取9907张宫颈涂片进行质量控制结果分析。本研究以专家阅片结果作为宫颈细胞学诊断金标准,对传统巴氏涂片及液基细胞涂片的宫颈细胞学检出阳性率差异、各质量控制指标差异及涂片不满意率差异等进行统计学比较。结果①液基细胞涂片的总检出阳性率、低度鳞状上皮内瘤变(LSIL)及高度鳞状上皮内瘤变(HSIL)的检出阳性率均较巴氏涂片高,且差异有统计学意义(2.41% vs 2.05%,χ2=39.885,P =0.000;0.58% vs 0.31%,χ2=113.772,P =0.000;0.14% vs 0.11%,χ2=4.464,P =0.035)。②抽取进行质量控制结果分析的涂片中,巴氏涂片与液基细胞涂片的假阴性率、特异度及符合率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);巴氏涂片假阳性率较液基细胞涂片低,而其灵敏度较液基细胞涂片高,且差异均有统计学意义(0 vs 0.55%,χ2=18.342,P =0.000;100.00% vs 75.00%,χ2=98.980,P =0.000)。③本组宫颈涂片中,涂片不满意率为4.17%(413/9907),首要原因为染色偏浅和(或)结构不清(54.24%);其次为细胞量不足(43.09%)。因细胞量不足导致的不满意率,巴氏涂片较液基细胞涂片高(2.45% vs 1.44%),而因染色偏浅和(或)结构不清导致的不满意率,则为液基细胞涂片较巴氏涂片高(3.34% vs 0.26%),且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=12.452,93.311;P =0.000)。结论北京市宫颈癌免费筛查的宫颈细胞学检出阳性率有待进一步提高。建立完善的宫颈细胞学质量控制评价系统,对涂片的取材、制片及染色等环节加以控制,以提高涂片满意度及宫颈细胞学阅片质量。
目的:探討2013年北京市宮頸癌免費篩查穫得的宮頸細胞學閱片的質量控製情況,併進行相關分析。方法自2013年在北京市16箇區、縣宮頸癌篩查機構接受宮頸癌免費篩查穫取的286781張宮頸塗片信息中,採用概率隨機抽樣法,隨機抽取9907張宮頸塗片進行質量控製結果分析。本研究以專傢閱片結果作為宮頸細胞學診斷金標準,對傳統巴氏塗片及液基細胞塗片的宮頸細胞學檢齣暘性率差異、各質量控製指標差異及塗片不滿意率差異等進行統計學比較。結果①液基細胞塗片的總檢齣暘性率、低度鱗狀上皮內瘤變(LSIL)及高度鱗狀上皮內瘤變(HSIL)的檢齣暘性率均較巴氏塗片高,且差異有統計學意義(2.41% vs 2.05%,χ2=39.885,P =0.000;0.58% vs 0.31%,χ2=113.772,P =0.000;0.14% vs 0.11%,χ2=4.464,P =0.035)。②抽取進行質量控製結果分析的塗片中,巴氏塗片與液基細胞塗片的假陰性率、特異度及符閤率比較,差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05);巴氏塗片假暘性率較液基細胞塗片低,而其靈敏度較液基細胞塗片高,且差異均有統計學意義(0 vs 0.55%,χ2=18.342,P =0.000;100.00% vs 75.00%,χ2=98.980,P =0.000)。③本組宮頸塗片中,塗片不滿意率為4.17%(413/9907),首要原因為染色偏淺和(或)結構不清(54.24%);其次為細胞量不足(43.09%)。因細胞量不足導緻的不滿意率,巴氏塗片較液基細胞塗片高(2.45% vs 1.44%),而因染色偏淺和(或)結構不清導緻的不滿意率,則為液基細胞塗片較巴氏塗片高(3.34% vs 0.26%),且差異均有統計學意義(χ2=12.452,93.311;P =0.000)。結論北京市宮頸癌免費篩查的宮頸細胞學檢齣暘性率有待進一步提高。建立完善的宮頸細胞學質量控製評價繫統,對塗片的取材、製片及染色等環節加以控製,以提高塗片滿意度及宮頸細胞學閱片質量。
목적:탐토2013년북경시궁경암면비사사획득적궁경세포학열편적질량공제정황,병진행상관분석。방법자2013년재북경시16개구、현궁경암사사궤구접수궁경암면비사사획취적286781장궁경도편신식중,채용개솔수궤추양법,수궤추취9907장궁경도편진행질량공제결과분석。본연구이전가열편결과작위궁경세포학진단금표준,대전통파씨도편급액기세포도편적궁경세포학검출양성솔차이、각질량공제지표차이급도편불만의솔차이등진행통계학비교。결과①액기세포도편적총검출양성솔、저도린상상피내류변(LSIL)급고도린상상피내류변(HSIL)적검출양성솔균교파씨도편고,차차이유통계학의의(2.41% vs 2.05%,χ2=39.885,P =0.000;0.58% vs 0.31%,χ2=113.772,P =0.000;0.14% vs 0.11%,χ2=4.464,P =0.035)。②추취진행질량공제결과분석적도편중,파씨도편여액기세포도편적가음성솔、특이도급부합솔비교,차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05);파씨도편가양성솔교액기세포도편저,이기령민도교액기세포도편고,차차이균유통계학의의(0 vs 0.55%,χ2=18.342,P =0.000;100.00% vs 75.00%,χ2=98.980,P =0.000)。③본조궁경도편중,도편불만의솔위4.17%(413/9907),수요원인위염색편천화(혹)결구불청(54.24%);기차위세포량불족(43.09%)。인세포량불족도치적불만의솔,파씨도편교액기세포도편고(2.45% vs 1.44%),이인염색편천화(혹)결구불청도치적불만의솔,칙위액기세포도편교파씨도편고(3.34% vs 0.26%),차차이균유통계학의의(χ2=12.452,93.311;P =0.000)。결론북경시궁경암면비사사적궁경세포학검출양성솔유대진일보제고。건립완선적궁경세포학질량공제평개계통,대도편적취재、제편급염색등배절가이공제,이제고도편만의도급궁경세포학열편질량。
Objective To analyze the data of cervical cytology quality control among women accepted free cervical cancer screening in Beijing in 2013.Methods Collected 286 781 cervical cytology smears information of free cervical cancer screening in medical screening units of 1 6 districts and counties in Beijing in 2013.Use probability random sampling method to get 9 907 cervical cytology smears for quality control analysis.Took the pathologists′diagnosis as golden standards.Detection positive rate,various indicators of quality control and unsatisfactory rate of smears were compared statistically between traditional Pap smear and liquid-based cervical cytology smear.Results ① The total detection positive rate and the detection positive rate of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion(HSIL)of liquid-based cytology smear were higher than those of traditional Pap smear,and the differences were statistically significant(2.41% vs 2.05%,χ2 =39.885,P =0.000;0.58% vs 0.31%,χ2 =1 13.772,P = 0.000;0.14% vs 0.1 1%,χ2 = 4.464,P = 0.035 ).② There were no significant differences between Pap smears and liquid-based cytology smears in false negative rate,specificity and coincidence rate (P >0.05).The false positive rate of Pap smears was lower than that of liquid- based cytology smears, while the sensitivity rate were higher,and the differences were statistically significant(0 vs 0.55%,χ2 =18.342,P =0.000;100.00% vs 75.00%,χ2 =98.980,P =0.000).③The dissatisfaction rate of smears was 4.1 7%(413/9 907)among 9 907 cervical cytology smears,and the primary reason was lighter dyeing and (or)unclear structure of cell (54.24%),followed by the lack of cell mass(43.09%).The dissatisfaction rate of Pap smears caused by lack of cell mass was higher than that of liquid-based cytology smears(2.45% vs 1.44%),while the dissatisfaction rate of liquid-based cytology smears caused by lighter dyeing and (or) unclear structure of cell was higher than that of Pap smears (3.34% vs 0.26%),and the differences were statistically significant(χ2 = 12.452,93.31 1;P =0.000).Conclusions Cervical cytology detection positive rate of free cervical cancer screening in Beijing need to be further improved.And it is necessary to establish a quality control evaluation system on cervical cytology,focusing on improvement of cells collection,cytology smear producing and drum dyeing,to improve satisfaction rate and quality of cervical cytology smears.