西部中医药
西部中醫藥
서부중의약
Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2015年
8期
135-136,137
,共3页
肛周脓肿%一期根治术%中药熏洗%中药坐浴
肛週膿腫%一期根治術%中藥熏洗%中藥坐浴
항주농종%일기근치술%중약훈세%중약좌욕
perianal abscess%one-phase radical correction%herbal fumigation%herbal hip bath
目的:观察一期根治术结合中药熏洗坐浴治疗肛门周围脓肿的临床疗效。方法:将371例患者随机分为2组。对照组176例,行一期根治术,术后常规紧线及换药治疗;观察组195例,在对照组治疗的基础上给予中药熏洗坐浴治疗,2组出院后均随访2年以上。结果:总有效率对照组为83.5%,观察组为96.9%,治疗组疗效优于对照组(P<0.05)。复发率对照组为11.36%,观察组为2.05%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。坠胀疼痛、水肿、创口渗液、排尿不畅等并发症消失时间及创口愈合时间观察组均小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:一期根治术结合中药熏洗坐浴治疗肛周脓肿疗效优于单纯手术治疗。治疗前显著改善(P<0.05),观察组改善更明显(P<0.05)。结论:四步推拿手法治疗肩周炎疗效优于封闭疗法。
目的:觀察一期根治術結閤中藥熏洗坐浴治療肛門週圍膿腫的臨床療效。方法:將371例患者隨機分為2組。對照組176例,行一期根治術,術後常規緊線及換藥治療;觀察組195例,在對照組治療的基礎上給予中藥熏洗坐浴治療,2組齣院後均隨訪2年以上。結果:總有效率對照組為83.5%,觀察組為96.9%,治療組療效優于對照組(P<0.05)。複髮率對照組為11.36%,觀察組為2.05%,2組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。墜脹疼痛、水腫、創口滲液、排尿不暢等併髮癥消失時間及創口愈閤時間觀察組均小于對照組(P<0.05)。結論:一期根治術結閤中藥熏洗坐浴治療肛週膿腫療效優于單純手術治療。治療前顯著改善(P<0.05),觀察組改善更明顯(P<0.05)。結論:四步推拿手法治療肩週炎療效優于封閉療法。
목적:관찰일기근치술결합중약훈세좌욕치료항문주위농종적림상료효。방법:장371례환자수궤분위2조。대조조176례,행일기근치술,술후상규긴선급환약치료;관찰조195례,재대조조치료적기출상급여중약훈세좌욕치료,2조출원후균수방2년이상。결과:총유효솔대조조위83.5%,관찰조위96.9%,치료조료효우우대조조(P<0.05)。복발솔대조조위11.36%,관찰조위2.05%,2조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。추창동통、수종、창구삼액、배뇨불창등병발증소실시간급창구유합시간관찰조균소우대조조(P<0.05)。결론:일기근치술결합중약훈세좌욕치료항주농종료효우우단순수술치료。치료전현저개선(P<0.05),관찰조개선경명현(P<0.05)。결론:사보추나수법치료견주염료효우우봉폐요법。
Objective: To observe clinical effects of one-phase radical correction, herbal fumigation and hip bath in treating perianal abscess. Methods: All 371 patients were randomly divided into two groups. 176 cases of the control group were treated with one-phase radical correction, conventional stringing after the operation and changing the dressings; 195 cases of the observation group received herbal fumigation and hip bath, both groups were followed for more than two years when they were discharged. Results: Total effective rate of the control group was 83.5%, low-er than 96.9% of the observation group, the observation group was superior to the control group in clinical effects (P<0.05). Relapse rate of the control group was 11.36%, higher than 2.05% of the observation group, the difference showed statistical meaning (P<0.05). The observation group was less than the control group in the disappearing time of the complications such as abdominal distension and pain, edema, wound exudation, urination difficulty and wound healing time (P<0.05). Conclusion: One-phase radical correction, herbal fumigation and hip bath are superior to only operation in treating perianal abscess.