中国循环杂志
中國循環雜誌
중국순배잡지
Chinese Circulation Journal
2015年
10期
981-983
,共3页
邓建君%梅光艳%谢萍%王效浣%侯婷婷%安彦强%李重伟%张文静
鄧建君%梅光豔%謝萍%王效浣%侯婷婷%安彥彊%李重偉%張文靜
산건군%매광염%사평%왕효완%후정정%안언강%리중위%장문정
持续性心房颤动%原发性高血压%昼夜节律
持續性心房顫動%原髮性高血壓%晝夜節律
지속성심방전동%원발성고혈압%주야절률
Persistent atrial ifbrillation%Essential hypertension%Circadian rhythm
目的:探讨持续性心房颤动(房颤)对原发性高血压患者血压昼夜节律变化的影响。<br> 方法:选取2013-01至2014-01我院就诊患者173例,将其分为原发性高血压组(高血压组,n=88),持续性房颤合并原发性高血压组(房颤合并高血压组,n=85例)。分析所有患者基线资料,并用Logistic回归分析影响持续性房颤合并原发性高血压患者的危险因素。<br> 结果:与高血压组比较,房颤合并高血压组白天平均舒张压、白天最小收缩压、白天最小舒张压、24 h平均舒张压均显著降低,夜间最大收缩压显著升高及舒张压反杓型比例显著升高(P均<0.05);两组白天平均收缩压、白天最大收缩压、白天最大舒张压、24 h平均收缩压、夜间平均收缩压、夜间平均舒张压、夜间最大舒张压、夜间最小收缩压、夜间最小舒张压及收缩压反杓型比例差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,夜间最大收缩压与持续性房颤合并高血压显著相关(比值比=1.038,95%可信区间:1.014~1.062,P<0.01)。<br> 结论:持续性房颤可导致原发性高血压患者白天血压显著下降,而夜间血压下降不明显。
目的:探討持續性心房顫動(房顫)對原髮性高血壓患者血壓晝夜節律變化的影響。<br> 方法:選取2013-01至2014-01我院就診患者173例,將其分為原髮性高血壓組(高血壓組,n=88),持續性房顫閤併原髮性高血壓組(房顫閤併高血壓組,n=85例)。分析所有患者基線資料,併用Logistic迴歸分析影響持續性房顫閤併原髮性高血壓患者的危險因素。<br> 結果:與高血壓組比較,房顫閤併高血壓組白天平均舒張壓、白天最小收縮壓、白天最小舒張壓、24 h平均舒張壓均顯著降低,夜間最大收縮壓顯著升高及舒張壓反杓型比例顯著升高(P均<0.05);兩組白天平均收縮壓、白天最大收縮壓、白天最大舒張壓、24 h平均收縮壓、夜間平均收縮壓、夜間平均舒張壓、夜間最大舒張壓、夜間最小收縮壓、夜間最小舒張壓及收縮壓反杓型比例差異無統計學意義(P均>0.05)。多因素Logistic迴歸分析顯示,夜間最大收縮壓與持續性房顫閤併高血壓顯著相關(比值比=1.038,95%可信區間:1.014~1.062,P<0.01)。<br> 結論:持續性房顫可導緻原髮性高血壓患者白天血壓顯著下降,而夜間血壓下降不明顯。
목적:탐토지속성심방전동(방전)대원발성고혈압환자혈압주야절률변화적영향。<br> 방법:선취2013-01지2014-01아원취진환자173례,장기분위원발성고혈압조(고혈압조,n=88),지속성방전합병원발성고혈압조(방전합병고혈압조,n=85례)。분석소유환자기선자료,병용Logistic회귀분석영향지속성방전합병원발성고혈압환자적위험인소。<br> 결과:여고혈압조비교,방전합병고혈압조백천평균서장압、백천최소수축압、백천최소서장압、24 h평균서장압균현저강저,야간최대수축압현저승고급서장압반표형비례현저승고(P균<0.05);량조백천평균수축압、백천최대수축압、백천최대서장압、24 h평균수축압、야간평균수축압、야간평균서장압、야간최대서장압、야간최소수축압、야간최소서장압급수축압반표형비례차이무통계학의의(P균>0.05)。다인소Logistic회귀분석현시,야간최대수축압여지속성방전합병고혈압현저상관(비치비=1.038,95%가신구간:1.014~1.062,P<0.01)。<br> 결론:지속성방전가도치원발성고혈압환자백천혈압현저하강,이야간혈압하강불명현。
Objective: To explore the effect of persistent atrial ifbrillation (AF) on circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in patients with essential hypertension (EH). <br> Methods: A total of 173 EH patients treated in Gansu Provincial Hospital from 2013-02 to 2014-01were studied. The patients were divided into 2 groups: EH group,n=88 and Persistent AF combining EH group,n=85. The baseline information was studied and the risk factors of persistent AF combining EH were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. <br> Results: Compared with EH group, the Persistent AF combining EH group showed decreased average daytime DBP, minimum daytime SBP, minimum daytime DBP and the average 24-hour DBP, while increased maximum nighttime SBP and the percentage of reverse dipper in DBP, allP<0.05. There were no significant differences for the average of daytime SBP, maximum daytime SBP, maximum daytime DBP, the average 24-hour SBP, average nighttime SBP, average nighttime DBP, maximum nighttime DBP, minimum nighttime SBP, minimum nighttime DBP and the percentage of reverse dipper in SBP between 2 groups, allP>0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the maximum nighttime SBP was obviously related to persistent AF combining EH (OR=1.038, 95 CI 1.014-1.062,P=0.001). <br> Conclusion: Persistent AF may incur daytime BP dropping, such change was not obviously observed for nighttime BP in EH patients.