上海针灸杂志
上海針灸雜誌
상해침구잡지
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
2015年
11期
1099-1101
,共3页
邹来勇%涂国卿%朱玉辉
鄒來勇%塗國卿%硃玉輝
추래용%도국경%주옥휘
针刺疗法%缪刺%颈椎病,神经根型%推拿%穴,液门
針刺療法%繆刺%頸椎病,神經根型%推拿%穴,液門
침자요법%무자%경추병,신경근형%추나%혈,액문
Acupuncture therapy%Contralateral needling%Cervical spondylosis,Nerve root type%Tuina%Point,Yemen
目的:观察整体平衡疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法将120例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组60例。治疗组采用整体平衡疗法(平衡针刺配合平衡推拿)治疗,对照组采用常规针刺配合推拿治疗。观察两组治疗前后颈部活动度各项指标,并比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后颈部活动度各项指标(颈部前屈、颈部后伸、侧屈度及旋转角度)与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后颈部活动度各项指标与对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率为95.0%,对照组为85.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论整体平衡疗法是一种治疗神经根型颈椎病的有效方法。
目的:觀察整體平衡療法治療神經根型頸椎病的臨床療效。方法將120例神經根型頸椎病患者隨機分為治療組和對照組,每組60例。治療組採用整體平衡療法(平衡針刺配閤平衡推拿)治療,對照組採用常規針刺配閤推拿治療。觀察兩組治療前後頸部活動度各項指標,併比較兩組臨床療效。結果兩組治療後頸部活動度各項指標(頸部前屈、頸部後伸、側屈度及鏇轉角度)與同組治療前比較,差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療組治療後頸部活動度各項指標與對照組比較,差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療組總有效率為95.0%,對照組為85.0%,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論整體平衡療法是一種治療神經根型頸椎病的有效方法。
목적:관찰정체평형요법치료신경근형경추병적림상료효。방법장120례신경근형경추병환자수궤분위치료조화대조조,매조60례。치료조채용정체평형요법(평형침자배합평형추나)치료,대조조채용상규침자배합추나치료。관찰량조치료전후경부활동도각항지표,병비교량조림상료효。결과량조치료후경부활동도각항지표(경부전굴、경부후신、측굴도급선전각도)여동조치료전비교,차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료조치료후경부활동도각항지표여대조조비교,차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료조총유효솔위95.0%,대조조위85.0%,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론정체평형요법시일충치료신경근형경추병적유효방법。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of general balance therapy in treating cervical spondylosis of nerve root type.Method Totally 120 patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 60 cases in each group. The treatment group was intervened by general balance therapy (balance needling plus balance tuina manipulations), while the control group was by ordinary acupuncture and tuina manipulations. The cervical movement ranges were observed before and after the treatment, and the clinical efficacies were compared between the two groups. Result The cervical movement ranges (forward flexion, backward extension, lateral flexion, and turning range) were significantly changed in both groups after the treatment (P<0.05). The cervical movement ranges of the treatment group were significantly different from that of the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 95.0% in the treatment group versus 85.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusion General balance therapy is an effective method in treating cervical spondylosis of nerve root type.