中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
Clinical Journal of Chinese Medicine
2015年
28期
50-52
,共3页
治疗方法%慢性肾盂肾炎%疗效对比
治療方法%慢性腎盂腎炎%療效對比
치료방법%만성신우신염%료효대비
Treatment method%Chronic pyelonephritis%Comparison of curative effect
目的:对比单纯西医与中西结合疗法治疗慢性肾盂肾炎的治疗效果,寻求治疗慢性肾盂肾炎更为有效的科学方法.方法:以2012年1月-2013年12月在本院进行治疗的80例慢性肾盂肾炎患者为研究对象,将其随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用中西医结合疗法,对照组采用西医常规疗法,比较两组患者的治疗效果.结果:实验组患者的治疗效果明显要好于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组治疗无效的比例明显要高于实验组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组患者尿液细菌培养转阴时间及尿常规转正常的时间均比对照组要短,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:采用中西医结合疗法治疗慢性肾盂肾炎,能够取得比单纯西医疗法更好的治疗效果,可在临床推广使用.
目的:對比單純西醫與中西結閤療法治療慢性腎盂腎炎的治療效果,尋求治療慢性腎盂腎炎更為有效的科學方法.方法:以2012年1月-2013年12月在本院進行治療的80例慢性腎盂腎炎患者為研究對象,將其隨機分為實驗組和對照組,實驗組採用中西醫結閤療法,對照組採用西醫常規療法,比較兩組患者的治療效果.結果:實驗組患者的治療效果明顯要好于對照組,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);對照組治療無效的比例明顯要高于實驗組,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);實驗組患者尿液細菌培養轉陰時間及尿常規轉正常的時間均比對照組要短,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:採用中西醫結閤療法治療慢性腎盂腎炎,能夠取得比單純西醫療法更好的治療效果,可在臨床推廣使用.
목적:대비단순서의여중서결합요법치료만성신우신염적치료효과,심구치료만성신우신염경위유효적과학방법.방법:이2012년1월-2013년12월재본원진행치료적80례만성신우신염환자위연구대상,장기수궤분위실험조화대조조,실험조채용중서의결합요법,대조조채용서의상규요법,비교량조환자적치료효과.결과:실험조환자적치료효과명현요호우대조조,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);대조조치료무효적비례명현요고우실험조,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);실험조환자뇨액세균배양전음시간급뇨상규전정상적시간균비대조조요단,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:채용중서의결합요법치료만성신우신염,능구취득비단순서의요법경호적치료효과,가재림상추엄사용.
Objective: Clinical effects of western medicine and the integrative medicine on chronic pyelonephritis were compared, to seek more effective scientific method for chronic pyelonephritis. Methods: 80 patients with chronic pyelonephritis from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital were selected as the research objects, and were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group; the experimental group received the integrative medicine; the control group was treated with routine therapy. Clinical efficiency in two groups were compared. Results: The cure rate and the efficacy in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group; the invalid proportion of treatment in the control group was significantly higher than that in the experimental group; bacterial culture negative time and urine routine negative time of patients in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group; there were statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: The integrative medicine was effective on chronic pyelonephritis, and worthy of promotion.