CAJ | 학술논문

“谋取不正当利益”是行贿罪犯罪研究中的重要问题，然而在我国目前的司法实践当中，对于行贿罪所谋取的“不正当利益”的范围界定以及如何对其进行追缴的问题，理论界和实务界却存在较大争议。对于此问题，首先应当明确，根据《刑法》规定以及公平正义的法治理念，对行贿犯罪所得的“不正当利益”应按照不同标准进行合理分类，分别处理。其中，针对行贿罪所得“不正当财产型利益”，应当通过《刑法》第64条中“违法所得”范围的审慎界定进行认定和追缴，重点针对行贿所得的间接性财产型利益能否认定为违法所得予以追缴进行讨论，以实现严厉打击行贿犯罪的目的以及刑法的公平正义理念。
“모취불정당이익”시행회죄범죄연구중적중요문제，연이재아국목전적사법실천당중，대우행회죄소모취적“불정당이익”적범위계정이급여하대기진행추격적문제，이론계화실무계각존재교대쟁의。대우차문제，수선응당명학，근거《형법》규정이급공평정의적법치이념，대행회범죄소득적“불정당이익”응안조불동표준진행합리분류，분별처리。기중，침대행회죄소득“불정당재산형이익”，응당통과《형법》제64조중“위법소득”범위적심신계정진행인정화추격，중점침대행회소득적간접성재산형이익능부인정위위법소득여이추격진행토론，이실현엄려타격행회범죄적목적이급형법적공평정의이념。
Illegitimate interests are important issues in the study on the crime of bribery, but there is a big controversy in the definition and the recovery ofimproper benefits in Chinese judicial theory and practice. With this problem, you should first define it reasonably in accordance with the judicial interpretation ofimproper benefits. Then in accordance with the 64th article of the penal provisions and the related judicial interpretations, illegal gains in bribery should be reasonably defined and recovered so that we can achieve the purpose of fighting against the crime of bribery and realize the justice of criminal law.