生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
Ecology and Environment Sciences
2015年
9期
1512-1518
,共7页
化肥施用强度%环境风险评价%环境安全阈值%模型构建%预警%淮河流域
化肥施用彊度%環境風險評價%環境安全閾值%模型構建%預警%淮河流域
화비시용강도%배경풍험평개%배경안전역치%모형구건%예경%회하류역
intensity of fertilization%environmental risk assessment%environmental safety threshold%modeling%warning%Huai River basin
深入认识淮河流域化肥施用环境风险,对提高化肥施用风险意识、加强风险管理、防治农业面源污染有着重要作用。综合考虑化肥施用强度、效率、环境安全阈值、环境影响效应及作物复种指数等5种因素,构建了化肥施用农田污染环境风险评价指数模型,对淮河流域化肥施用空间特征和环境风险进行研究。应用层次分析法,确定氮磷钾三因子对环境影响的权重系数。根据国家环境保护部2010年设定的生态乡镇建设化肥使用强度单位播种面积小于250 kg·hm-2的标准,按照氮磷钾1∶0.5∶0.5的比例,确定氮磷钾三因子的环境安全阈值。在不考虑氮磷钾单质化肥环境影响效应权重的情况下,以作物复种指数为1、化肥利用率为50%为基准,建立化肥环境风险评价等级标准。结果表明,淮河流域化肥施用强度最高的地市是淮南市,为1242.2 kg·hm-2,是强度最低的淄博市478.7 kg·hm-2的2.6倍。淮河流域平均化肥施用强度为776.6 kg·hm-2,是我国生态乡镇建设化肥施用标准的3.1倍。化肥施用强度分布有一定的规律性,大致沿着偏东北西南走向有4个带状分布区,高过量施肥区和中过量施肥区从南到北依次交替出现。淮河流域化肥施用环境风险总指数是0.74,属于中等程度风险,处于Ⅱ级预警。35个地市化肥污染风险预警级在Ⅰ和Ⅳ之间,分别呈连片状聚集分布。单质肥料氮磷钾风险指数分别是0.74、0.81和0.64,分别属于中度风险、严重风险和轻度风险,处于Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅰ级预警。总的来看,淮河流域过量的化肥施用普遍存在较为严重的中等环境风险,已经对流域的生态环境产生了较为严重的影响。
深入認識淮河流域化肥施用環境風險,對提高化肥施用風險意識、加彊風險管理、防治農業麵源汙染有著重要作用。綜閤攷慮化肥施用彊度、效率、環境安全閾值、環境影響效應及作物複種指數等5種因素,構建瞭化肥施用農田汙染環境風險評價指數模型,對淮河流域化肥施用空間特徵和環境風險進行研究。應用層次分析法,確定氮燐鉀三因子對環境影響的權重繫數。根據國傢環境保護部2010年設定的生態鄉鎮建設化肥使用彊度單位播種麵積小于250 kg·hm-2的標準,按照氮燐鉀1∶0.5∶0.5的比例,確定氮燐鉀三因子的環境安全閾值。在不攷慮氮燐鉀單質化肥環境影響效應權重的情況下,以作物複種指數為1、化肥利用率為50%為基準,建立化肥環境風險評價等級標準。結果錶明,淮河流域化肥施用彊度最高的地市是淮南市,為1242.2 kg·hm-2,是彊度最低的淄博市478.7 kg·hm-2的2.6倍。淮河流域平均化肥施用彊度為776.6 kg·hm-2,是我國生態鄉鎮建設化肥施用標準的3.1倍。化肥施用彊度分佈有一定的規律性,大緻沿著偏東北西南走嚮有4箇帶狀分佈區,高過量施肥區和中過量施肥區從南到北依次交替齣現。淮河流域化肥施用環境風險總指數是0.74,屬于中等程度風險,處于Ⅱ級預警。35箇地市化肥汙染風險預警級在Ⅰ和Ⅳ之間,分彆呈連片狀聚集分佈。單質肥料氮燐鉀風險指數分彆是0.74、0.81和0.64,分彆屬于中度風險、嚴重風險和輕度風險,處于Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅰ級預警。總的來看,淮河流域過量的化肥施用普遍存在較為嚴重的中等環境風險,已經對流域的生態環境產生瞭較為嚴重的影響。
심입인식회하류역화비시용배경풍험,대제고화비시용풍험의식、가강풍험관리、방치농업면원오염유착중요작용。종합고필화비시용강도、효솔、배경안전역치、배경영향효응급작물복충지수등5충인소,구건료화비시용농전오염배경풍험평개지수모형,대회하류역화비시용공간특정화배경풍험진행연구。응용층차분석법,학정담린갑삼인자대배경영향적권중계수。근거국가배경보호부2010년설정적생태향진건설화비사용강도단위파충면적소우250 kg·hm-2적표준,안조담린갑1∶0.5∶0.5적비례,학정담린갑삼인자적배경안전역치。재불고필담린갑단질화비배경영향효응권중적정황하,이작물복충지수위1、화비이용솔위50%위기준,건립화비배경풍험평개등급표준。결과표명,회하류역화비시용강도최고적지시시회남시,위1242.2 kg·hm-2,시강도최저적치박시478.7 kg·hm-2적2.6배。회하류역평균화비시용강도위776.6 kg·hm-2,시아국생태향진건설화비시용표준적3.1배。화비시용강도분포유일정적규률성,대치연착편동북서남주향유4개대상분포구,고과량시비구화중과량시비구종남도북의차교체출현。회하류역화비시용배경풍험총지수시0.74,속우중등정도풍험,처우Ⅱ급예경。35개지시화비오염풍험예경급재Ⅰ화Ⅳ지간,분별정련편상취집분포。단질비료담린갑풍험지수분별시0.74、0.81화0.64,분별속우중도풍험、엄중풍험화경도풍험,처우Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅰ급예경。총적래간,회하류역과량적화비시용보편존재교위엄중적중등배경풍험,이경대류역적생태배경산생료교위엄중적영향。
Soil pollution by fertilization has become one key cause of water pollution in watershed. Environmental risk assessment of fertilization in Huai River basin were made in order to fully recognize the intensity of agricultural fertilization and its potential threats to the ecological environment, strengthen environmental risk awareness and control agricultural non-point pollution. Model of fertilization environmental risk assessment was established by introducing such five factors as fertilization intensity, fertilization environmental safety threshold, fertilization environmental effect weight, multi-cropping index (MCI) and fertilization efficiency. Analystic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weights of N, P, K. The environmental safety thresholds of N, P, K was made according to the standard of 250 kg·hm-2, the total fertilizers mass per sowing cropland, which is for the construction of ecological villages and town sponsored by Chinese government,and the proportion of 1∶0.5∶0.5 for N∶P∶K. The standard of classification for the fertilization environmental risk was made on such conditions as the equal impacts on the environment for the single fertilizers, 1 MCI and the ratio of 50%for fertilizer efficiency. Results showed that, at present the rate of farmland fertilizer in Huai River basin is 776.6 kg·hm-2, which is as 3.1 times as the standard of 250 kg·hm-2 with the regional difference from the maximum of 1 242.2 kg·hm-2 to the minimum of 478.7 kg·hm-2. The distribution of fertilization intensity showed four east-west strips from south to north with alternation of high overuse fertilization trip to medium overuse fertilization. The fertilization environmental risk index of Huai River was 0.74, belong to medium degree risk, at Ⅱ warning grade. The warning grades for 35 regions in this basin ranged from Ⅰ to Ⅳ with clustering distribution. The risk indexes for nitrogen, phosphorus and potash were 0.74, 0.81, 0.64, respectively, each being at Ⅱ, Ⅳ, and Ⅰ warning grade. The overuse of fertilizers has resulted in serious environmental problems.