价值工程
價值工程
개치공정
Value Engineering
2015年
33期
219-220
,共2页
徐志钦%朱迎春%李娜%赵彬宇
徐誌欽%硃迎春%李娜%趙彬宇
서지흠%주영춘%리나%조빈우
任务工单式考核法%基础护理技术%应用
任務工單式攷覈法%基礎護理技術%應用
임무공단식고핵법%기출호리기술%응용
task order assessment method%basic nursing technology%application
目的:探讨任务工单式考核法在基础护理技术实训课中的应用效果.方法:选择2013级56名专科护生作为实验组,采用任务工单式考核法;选择2013级55名专科护生作为对照组,采用传统考核模式,比较两组护生基础护理技能的考核成绩,并通过调查问卷了解实验组护生对任务工单式考核法的评价.结果:对照组护生的考核总成绩为87.06分±3.66分,实验组护生的考核总成绩为88.48分±2.48分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);在评估病人、沟通与人文关怀、健康教育和护理操作流程方面,实验组学生的成绩也高于对照组学生(P﹤0.05).实验组大部分护生对任务工单式考核法持赞同态度.结论:任务工单式考核法能比较全面、客观、公平地评价护生基础护理技能水平和综合能力.
目的:探討任務工單式攷覈法在基礎護理技術實訓課中的應用效果.方法:選擇2013級56名專科護生作為實驗組,採用任務工單式攷覈法;選擇2013級55名專科護生作為對照組,採用傳統攷覈模式,比較兩組護生基礎護理技能的攷覈成績,併通過調查問捲瞭解實驗組護生對任務工單式攷覈法的評價.結果:對照組護生的攷覈總成績為87.06分±3.66分,實驗組護生的攷覈總成績為88.48分±2.48分,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P﹤0.05);在評估病人、溝通與人文關懷、健康教育和護理操作流程方麵,實驗組學生的成績也高于對照組學生(P﹤0.05).實驗組大部分護生對任務工單式攷覈法持讚同態度.結論:任務工單式攷覈法能比較全麵、客觀、公平地評價護生基礎護理技能水平和綜閤能力.
목적:탐토임무공단식고핵법재기출호리기술실훈과중적응용효과.방법:선택2013급56명전과호생작위실험조,채용임무공단식고핵법;선택2013급55명전과호생작위대조조,채용전통고핵모식,비교량조호생기출호리기능적고핵성적,병통과조사문권료해실험조호생대임무공단식고핵법적평개.결과:대조조호생적고핵총성적위87.06분±3.66분,실험조호생적고핵총성적위88.48분±2.48분,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P﹤0.05);재평고병인、구통여인문관부、건강교육화호리조작류정방면,실험조학생적성적야고우대조조학생(P﹤0.05).실험조대부분호생대임무공단식고핵법지찬동태도.결론:임무공단식고핵법능비교전면、객관、공평지평개호생기출호리기능수평화종합능력.
Objective: to discuss the application effect of task order assessment method in basic nursing technology training class. Method: 56 nursing students of 2013 are selected as the experimental group, using task order assessment method; 55 nursing students of 2013 are selected as the control group, using traditional assessment method. Compare the assessment grade of the two groups of students and learn the experiment group's evaluation on the task order assessment method though questionnaire. Result: the assessment grade of the control group is 87.06±3.66, and the grade of the experiment group is 88.48±2.48. The comparative difference has statistical significance (P﹤0.05). The grade of the experiment group is higher than the control group in evaluation of patients, communication and humanistic care, health education and nursing operation process (P﹤0.05). Most of the students in the experiment group support the task order assessment method. Conclusion: the task order assessment method can evaluate the basic nursing skills and comprehensive abilities of the nursing students comprehensively, objectively and fairly.