哈尔滨工程大学学报
哈爾濱工程大學學報
합이빈공정대학학보
Journal of Harbin Engineering University
2015年
9期
1206-1211
,共6页
王烨%王良璧%胡文婷%孙鹏宝
王燁%王良璧%鬍文婷%孫鵬寶
왕엽%왕량벽%호문정%손붕보
建筑节能%自然对流%供暖%对流换热系数%热舒适%数值模拟
建築節能%自然對流%供暖%對流換熱繫數%熱舒適%數值模擬
건축절능%자연대류%공난%대류환열계수%열서괄%수치모의
building energy-saving%natural convection%heating%convective heat transfer coefficient%thermal com-fort%numerical simulation
为研究建筑外壁面换热系数与供暖室内自然对流换热的关联性,采用修正的湍流k-ε模型对外墙外壁面不同换热系数情况下的室内自然对流换热过程进行了数值分析并对比了热负荷值. 结果表明:在满足室内供暖温度( 18℃)要求条件下,考虑外界辐射和蒸发对外壁面换热过程的作用(外壁面换热系数取8.1 W·m-2·℃-1),所得散热器表面的换热能力要低于按照暖通设计规范取值(外壁面换热系数取23.3 W·m-2·℃-1)所得结果,两种取值方式对室内温度场和舒适性的影响很微弱,但所得室内热负荷之间的差异达到了6.2%.
為研究建築外壁麵換熱繫數與供暖室內自然對流換熱的關聯性,採用脩正的湍流k-ε模型對外牆外壁麵不同換熱繫數情況下的室內自然對流換熱過程進行瞭數值分析併對比瞭熱負荷值. 結果錶明:在滿足室內供暖溫度( 18℃)要求條件下,攷慮外界輻射和蒸髮對外壁麵換熱過程的作用(外壁麵換熱繫數取8.1 W·m-2·℃-1),所得散熱器錶麵的換熱能力要低于按照暖通設計規範取值(外壁麵換熱繫數取23.3 W·m-2·℃-1)所得結果,兩種取值方式對室內溫度場和舒適性的影響很微弱,但所得室內熱負荷之間的差異達到瞭6.2%.
위연구건축외벽면환열계수여공난실내자연대류환열적관련성,채용수정적단류k-ε모형대외장외벽면불동환열계수정황하적실내자연대류환열과정진행료수치분석병대비료열부하치. 결과표명:재만족실내공난온도( 18℃)요구조건하,고필외계복사화증발대외벽면환열과정적작용(외벽면환열계수취8.1 W·m-2·℃-1),소득산열기표면적환열능력요저우안조난통설계규범취치(외벽면환열계수취23.3 W·m-2·℃-1)소득결과,량충취치방식대실내온도장화서괄성적영향흔미약,단소득실내열부하지간적차이체도료6.2%.
To study the relationship between the outer surface heat transfer coefficient of an external wall and the natural convective heat transfer characteristics in a heating room in Lanzhou, a revised k-εmodel was used to nu-merically analyze indoor natural convective heat transfer under different outer surface heat transfer coefficients of the external wall. The corresponding heat load was also compared. The results indicate that, under the conditions of 18℃ average indoor air temperature, and the outer surface heat transfer coefficient of the external wall is set to 8.1 W·m-2·℃-1, the heat transfer ability of the radiator surface, considering outdoor radiation and evaporation, is less than that when the outer surface heat transfer coefficient of external wall is set to 23.3 W·m-2·℃-1, ac-cording to the HV&AC design specification. Both values of the outer surface heat transfer coefficient of the external wall have very weak effects on the indoor temperature field and thermal comfort. However, the difference of calcu-lated heat load between them has reached 6.2%.